Construction Law Exam

1169 Words3 Pages

Objectives of the Australian East Coast method for Secutiry of Payment Legislation have mainly been to provide those at the bottom of the hierarchy of contractual chain with a cheap and quick redress, through ensuring payments for the works they have carried out. Over the course of this essay, this model shall be assessed for the objectives it was due to achieve against the commercial realities and legal inconsistencies to argue against and disagree with the statement. The Security of Payment legislation came under the slogan of ridding the construction industry of the unAustralian practice of not paying contractors for the work they had done. The main objective of this legislation was to ensure the contractors; mainly the ones down at chain of hierarchy of contracts receive security for their payments. Targeting mainly the smaller sub-contractors and suppliers, the East Coast legislations attempt to provide for a fair and balanced payment standard for construction contracts. In an attempt to provide quick and cheap resolution of payment the NSW Act for instance provides that upon submission of a Payment Claim the respondent has to provide for the Payment Schedule within 10 business days. Similar position is seen in the Victorian Act under s9 with the same amount of time stipulated. However the Cole Royal Commission found that the payments of sub-contractors were delayed or avoided deliberately. Such a practice is carried out by contractors up in the hierarchy of chain of contracts for a number of reasons including: to pay off tail of other jobs; paying off debts or bank over drafts; purchasing property and investing in collateral development etc. Payments have further been held off from the sub-contractors to reduce claims o... ... middle of paper ... ... industry in recession, the industry is tight. This makes the job for the legislation more difficult than it would have been in a booming industry. However, the law is needed more in such times, flaws within them are better inspected and such should be the times when relief is provided as well. The East Coast legislative Model provides the construction industry at large with a mechanism of swift and cheap payment claims indeed. However, on a deeper analysis the benefit of those enactments has not necessarily reached the desired audience. There are problems with the enforcement of provisions. Commercial pressures often subjugate the protection afforded by the provisions. More importantly, adjudication schemes are more costly than not pursuing a claim taking in account the overall affairs. Therefore, rendering it ineffective in the overall aims it intended to achieve.

Open Document