Priestley presents the conflict between the two different generations through the use of their juxtaposing views and outlooks on the world. There are clear differences between the two generations that set them apart, such as the way they talk about the working class and their choice to learn or not from the experience the inspector puts them through. These factors combined with others clearly lay out a defined area of conflict and juxtaposing ideas that the youth and age have.
One way Priestley starts to present the conflict between youth and age is by giving the younger characters more progressive and open minded views than the single minded, archaic views of the adults. In Birling’s speech he refers to himself as a ‘hard headed business
…show more content…
They perceive the younger generation as being foolish and unintelligent. However it is generally the younger generation who are more emotionally intelligent and open to new ideas. When Eric learns that Birling fired Eva Smith he exclaims ”Is that why she committed suicide” The use of a straightforward, single clause sentence accentuates the shock and raw emotion displayed by Eric. He is dismissed and told to “just keep quiet”, the monosyllabic nature of the imperative sentence further shows how dismissive the sentence is. This demonstrates how ignorant the older generation are, contrasting with insight that the younger generation seem to possess. Sheila has a similar, human and heartfelt response to the news, she exclaims “How horrible”, The alliteration of the ‘H’ sound again shows the harshness and raw emotion of the exclamation. she realises the sheer horror of a girl killing herself. This is contrasted with Birlings response which is “(rather impatiently) Yes, yes. Horrid business” The word business is used to make explicit the cold hearted, inhumane nature of Birling. He cares more about whether her death will impact him or not. The gap between Birlings emotionally shallow and uncaring outlook on life, and the more emotionally diverse and heartfelt minds …show more content…
These views and prejudices are all they have ever known. When the Inspector comes in and “massively cuts in” he demonstrates what consequences their selfish actions have, they realise that this is not how it should be. The crucial difference between the older characters and the younger characters is that they adults choose not to learn from the experience. Priestly shows this by making an explicit difference between Eric and Sheila's language at the start of the book and at the end. For example towards the start of the book Shielia declares that ‘It was a mean thing to do, perhaps that spoilt everything for her’. The word ‘mean’ is very juvenile and has associations with childhood arguments. The work ‘spoilt’ is very simplistic, echoes the fact that she is a spoilt child and also has connotations of a futile argument. Later on in the book Eric admits that "used her for the end of a stupid drunken evening, as if she were an animal, a thing, not a person". Self reflection and self criticism is used to demonstrate his emotional intelligence, the multi clause sentence and admittance shows how he has developed along with Sheila throughout the book. Eric then later on decides that his father “could have kept her on instead of throwing her out” Eric’s input is then put down with Birling’s reply- “rubbish”. The harsh ‘sh’ sound enforces the malevolent
After Inspector Goole enters the house, he informs the Birling’s about the death of a lower class woman who had died due to swallowing a disinfectant. Afterwards, Arthur Birling admits he had sacked the girl after remembering what had happened two years ago due to her being one of the ring leaders in strike demanding higher wages.
Mr Arthur Birling is the man of the house he has his wife Sybil, his
When the “decently dressed” Lengel tried to tell the girls to be “decently dressed” because the girls were wearing “bathing suits”, the girls first argued they “are decent” and left because the girls thought what they were doing was not wrong since they have different perspective than Lengel. The result of feeling empathy for the younger generation in "Railway Club Blues" is that the older generation saw the younger generation as themselves and the protagonist mentioned that teens were the “Strange children of the simple punks we were”. Also, despite of the younger teens “clothes are odd [and] their attitudes obscure”, the protagonist saw their faces that gave him “a kindred memory” of how the teens “repeat the ancient dance”. Ultimately, because the two generations were able to enjoyed a small jazz performance together, the protagonist felt “all cardboard boundaries are erased.”. Both authors used contrast to show the results of feeling empathy for the younger generation, and in “A&P”, the result of Lengel feeling empathy for the teenagers is that he was rejected by the youth due to their contrasting perspectives. When the protagonist from “Railway Club Blues” felt the “boundaries are erased” when the music began to play, this demonstrates how the the protagonist felt how everyone shared the same feelings and empathize the teens despite
I think that Priestley’s main aim in the play is to get across to the
Louise, the unfortunate spouse of Brently Mallard dies of a supposed “heart disease.” Upon the doctor’s diagnosis, it is the death of a “joy that kills.” This is a paradox of happiness resulting into a dreadful ending. Nevertheless, in reality it is actually the other way around. Of which, is the irony of Louise dying due to her suffering from a massive amount of depression knowing her husband is not dead, but alive. This is the prime example to show how women are unfairly treated. If it is logical enough for a wife to be this jovial about her husband’s mournful state of life then she must be in a marriage of never-ending nightmares. This shows how terribly the wife is being exploited due her gender in the relationship. As a result of a female being treated or perceived in such a manner, she will often times lose herself like the “girl
behaving just as we did. Eric is the only other who has been affected. by the Inspector like Sheila, they are the younger generation and are. both sorry for their faults, and are very likely to change their view. of themselves thereby reducing the divide between lower and upper class people, as they realise how the both abused their position.
Priestley's Social Message in An Inspector Calls The play an Inspector Call’s was written at the time of 1945 but is set in 1912. Priestley conveys a lot of social and important messages in this play. He conveys the messages through the character of Inspector Goole. One most important message that Priestley conveys is about Socialism.
First, the speaker is revealed to be “sobbing”, which subsequently causes him to “swing harder and harder” while he murders Danny (54). This lack of emotional control demonstrates the speaker’s complete inability to deal with hardship.
At the start the playwright creates slight allusions that produce tension; Sheila wondered ‘half seriously what had happened to Gerald previous summer when Gerald never went near Sheila’. Lady Croft and Sir George have not come to the engagement feast and Eric is behaving quite anxiously. Eric’s strange behaviour on the cheerful occasion creates trepidation and foreshadows a rather surprising event which interests the audience.
The whole family’s actions are the cause of Eva’s death however the message about responsibility the Inspector presents is only take on board by Eric and Sheila. In conclusion, Priestley clearly gets across his message of responsibility towards others in the play. A clever script cunningly executed points out Priestley’s views to the audience. ‘Responsibility’ is the focal point of the play and is consistently addressed at the end of each interrogation, but the Birlings fail to recognise this.
Inspector Goole shows the Birlings or the reader should act and how “We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.” Priestly uses inspector Goole to show us how if we do not learn to care for each other “ And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught in fire and blood and anguish”.
Priestley presents Mrs. Birling as a snobbish, unfair and unkind woman. She feels herself to be above other people who are in a different class to the one she is, and when the inspector arrives she treats him like an inferior. She does not meet the inspector until Act Two. In the meantime, he has been questioning other characters and there has been an argument between Sheila and Gerald.
In the play “An inspector calls” by J.B priestly, Mr Birling and Shelia Birling have contrasting attitudes to social issues. The author uses this to difference to highlight the diversity between generations and their reaction to situations faced. Arthur Birling is the father to Shelia Birling and is presented as the old fashion generation whereas Shelia is the young generation, who is more aware of the responsibility she has towards other people.The play begins with Mr birling and his family celebrating the engagement of Shelia and Gerald. The atmosphere is happy and light-hearted. Before the inspector arrives, Mr Birling is happy with life and himself “It’s one of the happiest nights of my life.” This shows that Mr Birling is quire selfish because he only thinks that it is one of the happiest nights of his life and not of Shelia and Gerald.
Sheila Birling is another character in ?An Inspector Calls? who also points this out during the play, ?You fool- he knows. Of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don?t know yet. You?ll see. You?ll see.?
J.B Priestley use of Sheila Birling to Convey His Message to the Audience in An Inspector Calls