Comparison Of King John And The Magna Carta

774 Words2 Pages

In this essay I will be discussing about King John and the Magna Carta. King John also known as John Lackland ruled England for seventeen years in the Middle Ages. He was born in 24 December 1166 Beaumont Palace, Oxford to Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, John was the youngest of 12 and the favourite son of Henry II. John was an unpopular King for number of reasons like unsuccessful battles, demanding higher taxes, this gave many haters. John was forced to sign the Magna Carta, because of his poor decisions he made towards England.

The Magna Carta is a document that dates back to the year 1215. The name is Latin for 'Great Charter'. A charter is a written document that defines the rights of a group of people. In this case the document …show more content…

Until then, there had been a belief that the monarch was the absolute ruler and therefore could do whatever they pleased. The Magna Carta forced the king to accept that there should be some laws that even the monarchy had to obey. This established the principle of the rule of law, meaning that law itself should be the absolute ruler, not kings and queens (or, later in history, governments and parliaments). The rule of law established certain rights for all people, such as the right to a fair trial. Over the years these rights have been expanded in ways that are discussed in other chapters in this unit. In John's time there was no parliament. Because the Magna Carta established the council of 25 barons whom the king was supposed to consult on matters that were important to the country, some people also believe it sowed the seed for parliamentary democracy in England. Even though John was not required to take the barons' advice, this did mark the beginning of the power being shared by more people. The running of the state was now the concern of a group rather than an

Open Document