Comparison Of Dracula And Bram Stoker's Dracula

1531 Words4 Pages

Bram Stoker’s Dracula is analogous to the 1958 movie Horror of Dracula. Dracula, a novel from 1897, is a story of a group of friends who come together, to not only fight for themselves, but also to fight for each other, and the curse of the vampire. They fight for peace and clarity, in order to resume their daily lives. The Horror of Dracula, A 1958 film, is a story of two men coming together to save their family from the curse of the vampire. Between both the film and the novel: the overall context, characters, and myths remain similar, however small differences develop each story, leading to each ending. The movie, based off of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, has a storyline that remains focused on the novel. Between both the movie and the novel, …show more content…

These vampires both have the same characteristics: long, sharp, white canine teeth that produce a crooked, sly smile. A long, black coat, with combed back hair that gives the count a sophisticated identity. Pale skin that is cold to the touch with hard red eyes. However with these similarities, differences were also shown. In the Horror of Dracula, Count Dracula did not have a white mustache like Dracula in Bram Stoker's novel. He also looked younger than he was portrayed in the novel, as in the novel they describe Dracula as an “old man”. Unlike in Dracula, Count Dracula cannot talk in the Horror of Dracula. Throughout the entire film, Dracula communicates with the characters through body language, not speech. Just like the novel, Dracula lives in his Transylvania castle, however, Carfax is not apart of the film, as in the film, the story is more of a straight line, rather than broken down into separate parts. These similarities and differences can suggest that the director of the movie wanted to remain focused on Bram Stoker’s idea of the vampire. With Dracula not talking throughout the movie; Fisher, the director of The Horror of Dracula, could’ve wanted Dracula to have a more suspenseful feel to him. Using just music in the scenes with Dracula, allowed the audience to focus more on the scene, rather than the dialog. These differences between the vampires, contributed to each ending. These similarities …show more content…

Although not completely altered, many differences are shown between the plot in the film and in the novel. In the beginning, Harker does go to Dracula’s castle in Transylvania. However, he does not go to help Dracula purchase his castle in Carfax. Instead, in The Horror of Dracula, Jonathan goes to be Dracula’s library assistant. Harker does not go to help the count, as he already knows Dracula is a vampire, instead, his goal on the trip is to kill him. In his quest to kill Dracula, Harker kills one of Dracula’s vampire wives. As he does this, Dracula runs away before Jon can kill him, and eventually Dracula kills Jon instead. Unlike the novel, where Jon kills Dracula, in the film Dracula kills Jon. Van Helsing then goes to Transylvania to look for Jon, just to find him dead in Dracula’s castle. Van Helsing knows what happened and breaks the news to Lucy, Arthur, and Mina Holmwood. However, Van Helsing will not tell them how he died.(Unlike the novel, Lucy is Jonathan’s fiancee, and Mina and Arthur are brother/sister in law to Jon.) In

Open Document