Comparison Of Courtly Love In The Divine Comedy And Dante's Inferno

652 Words2 Pages

e poem Ad Finem relates to Dante’s Inferno because it conveys the idea of the differences between courtly love and lust, shown in Dante’s second circle of the Inferno: The Lustful, where love is tied to reason and eternal happiness through God, whereas lust is tied to passion and limited happiness through earthly pleasures.
Considering the characters of Dante and Beatrice, their relationship exemplifies that of courtly love. In the context of The Divine Comedy, Beatrice is connected with Virgil and appeals to him to guide her beloved Dante through Hell because she is unable to travel there, owing to her permanent residence in Paradise. In making the connection between Beatrice and Virgil, Dante is expressing his notion that courtly love is tied to reason rather than passion. But what is lust? If love is the rabbit, then lust is the wolf. Dante says so explicitly when he identifies lust as a sin of wolf-like incontinence—a sin in which passion overtakes reason. Dante places Paolo and Francesca in the Circle of the Lustful because during their indulgence, their reason should have told them to stray from one another since one of them was joined to another in marriage. In the context of Ad Finem, a direct comparison between Paolo and Francesca and the narrator of the poem is shown when she (assuming the narrator is female) “would gladly barter [her] hopes of Heaven and all the bliss of Eternity” for the pleasures of human desire, in which Paolo and Francesca have done; their lust has overcome reason—reason being to strive for eternal happiness in Paradise with God (Wilcox, 19). Lust deals with the greatest of earthly pleasures, and it is powerful enough to distract the mind— which is the faculty of reason—and prompts it to focus on e...

... middle of paper ...

...l just underneath Limbo. In Dante’s Divine Comedy, the dichotomy of lust and the chastity of courtly love is found, as typified by the relationship between Dante and Beatrice. But between Paolo and Francesca and the relationship between the lovers of Ad Finem, both couples have found that they have misplaced their love for the lustful fulfillment of earthly desires. The difference between the two couples is that Francesca admits she never got the chance to repent for her sins. In Ad Finem, the narrator makes it clear that “never a joy are the angels keeping to lay at [her] feet in Paradise” like that of which her lover brings her; God cannot bring her happiness; therefore it is a misplaced love (Wilcox 29). She knows she will be punished for her lustful sin, but she believes “hell has no terror, to change or alter a [manifestation] of love like [hers]” (Wilcox 39).

Open Document