Throughout history art has been used to study the human form, and the symbolism in which they portray. Beginning with cave drawings and carving into stone, growing into this vast form of expression which has filled the world. In the earlier times art was a significant tool to allow each human to study and remember moments and characteristics, Venus of Willendorf, and Standing Female Figure are both an example of these types of historical sculptures. In the beginning there was in fact many pieces of art that were sculpted into stone as a representation of a human beings. This was a big step for mankind, and an even bigger step for our development. When these artists created these sculptures, they were both studying the human form, yet each shows completely different composition. While these two sculptures have instant similarities, and symbolism that pertain to life, and fertility, as well as portraying the human figure they also have a large number of differences which allow each piece to show its own personality, and cultural style. …show more content…
2600–2400 BC. This sculpture portrays a woman that is very balanced in proportions, the head slightly arched, with hips curving out and a waist that looks even in width with the knees. This sculpture has the woman’s arms crossing under her chest, as if she is clutching her stomach, it is almost as if the woman is anxious. These aspects of the sculpture flow together showing a smooth sculpture that looks as if it were measured carefully for accuracy. This sculpture is 24ft ¾ in. carved out of marble and laced with traces of red pigment, this suggests that the surface of the sculpture held as much importance as the sculpture itself. The Standing Female Figure is the name piece of the Bastis Master, this sculpture is an example of the signature style that was common in the Cycladic
The durability of clay has brought forth an immense abundance of Greek pottery, a craft mastered by Athenian artists. Archeologists have found hundreds of varieties in creation, shape, function, style, and artwork in Archaic vases. The museum has been blessed with one of these priceless artifacts; it is the duty of this establishment to accumulate as much data as possible surrounding the vase. In first identifying technique, dimensions, and condition, as well as describing shape, ornament, and figural scenery, one may then begin to analyze the vase. This serves the general purpose of understanding where the artifact stands in Greek culture and history. Through the examination and research of figural scenes, it is then possible to compare these to other scenes and styles of the same and other painters. Finally, one can then hypothesize where, why, and how this piece was used.
We find that, in conclusion, that these pieces are very similar in many ways. They are both originally created in the same style and time period. They are Hellenistic and dramatic, although in their own, individualistic way. Each sculpture was created in different mediums and have different stories. These are both very individualistic pieces of Greco/Roman sculpture that has influenced many artists throughout time and will
There are several differences between the sculpture of Menkaure and Khamerernebty, and the sculpture of Akhenaten and Nefertiti.
the statue was made for and depicts a warrior by the name of Kroisos who died a hero in battle. He was buried in a city/town called Anavysos near the city of Athens. Kroisos is portrayed in a frontal facing stance toward the viewer with a very natural look, like the egyptian statue of king Menkaure. The body proportions and head shape are more realistic than other statues from ancient greece.The statue of kroisos is made of one solid piece of marble and was chiseled out. He is depicted nude with his arms hanging down alongside his hips and torso. His hands are clenched lightly and the thumbs are facing forward. It looks like he may have been holding something at one point as well. Kroisos has an almost emotionless facial expression with an archaic smile,wide eyes and good amount of detail in the
Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.
To summarize Gisela Marie Augusta Richter’s Korai: archaic Greek maidens; a study of the development of the Kore type in Greek sculpture, this book catalogs and illustrates most of the Greek Korai figures within the period 650-480 B.C. Each section is prefaced with statements on the chronology and evolution of the grouped material that follows, as well as describing each piece briefly and listing its dimensions and inventory number. Richter also writes about the meanings, origins, and details of the pieces. The book is viewed as an indispensable tool for the study and cataloging of the female statues of Greece. G. M. A. Richter became the most distinguished American museum curator of classical art during her time as a curator at the Metropolitan
The human form transcends throughout time persistently present in art. Dating all the way back to Paleolithic human beings our renderings of idealized forms have served many purposes. Though the Neolithic and Paleolithic purpose of these renderings is widely speculative the range of reason for these depictions ranges from idolization and worship to assertion of aristocratic and economic status even to simply serving as statements of self-expression. Amongst ruins and artifacts, sculptures of ancient cultures demonstrate the ways in which humans perceptions of what is aesthetically desirable have progressed. Two idealized sculptures the Woman from Willendorf and the Khafre statue with approximately 21,500 years separating their individual gestations this demonstrate the stylistic progression of idealized imagery through time.
If someone who had no prior knowledge about art, or the elements and principles of design, were given five seconds to look at these two paintings, they’d probably say they had almost nothing in common, other than the fact that they both feature mountains, and it’d be true for those people. But, if you are someone that does know a lot of information
"Statuette of a standing maiden [Etruscan] (17.190.2066) | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History | The Metropolitan Museum of Art." The Metropolitan Museum of Art - Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.
In regards to subject matter, both pieces of sculpture are of leaders, Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II were the pharaoh and queen of Egypt around 2500 BCE., and Caesar Augustus was the Emperor of Rome from September 23, 63 BCE to August 19, 14 CE., shown in this work as a general from Primaport, Italy.
The Venus of Willendorf and the Venus de Milo are two ancient day venus sculptures representing two different views on beauty. The Venus of Willendorf is a small 4.5 inch limestone figure of a Goddess which is believed to be used as a fertility symbol, while the Venus de Milo is a tall ancient Greek statue of a Goddess which is said to represent love and beauty. The Venus of Willendorf’s body structure is very different than that of Venus de Milo. The venus of Willendorf appears to be a short lady with a large emphasis on her reproductive organs, breasts and stomach area whereas the Venus de Milo appears to be very tall with smaller breasts, and a really athletic build. She appears to have abs and looks as if she has not had children before, while the Venus of Willendorf looks like she has had children due to her huge breasts and stretched out belly button. The Venus
2575–2465 B.C. It is a statue that was painted with limestone and represents a non- royal couple. The dimension of the statue is H. 62 cm (24.7/16 in.); W. 24.5 cm (9 5/8 in.); D. 15.2 cm (6 in.). The Credit Line was linked to Rogers Fund, 1948. With accession Number: 48.111.
From the beginning of time, human beings have used art to commemorate their presence on Earth while allowing future generations a glimpse into that which they deemed valuable. From the Neolithic time period to the Romans of the first century, humans have been represented through art forms. Comparing and contrasting the variety of ways in which humans have been represented allows the modern scholar to decipher the significance of these art forms within the culture they were created in. Art within the Neolithic time period brought about a new style of painting; humans were represented frequently and were portrayed in a variety of poses and settings.
During the ancient times in Greece, Plato was the first human to document and criticize the existence of art and artists. He mentioned that human art was always in a form of a representation of something else. In one of Plato’s famous works, he demonstrates the idea of art is like an “imitation of nature” (Blocker 3). In other words, the purpose of art was to represent nature and nothing else. Art was not created for the sake of its own self nor was it created to appreciate its own beauty by any means. Instead, art, usually in forms of writings, paintings, or sculptures, was created to only to represent nature, Gods, emperors, families, or other important individuals. Furthermore, Plato had a very critical view towards the existence art in our society because art makes us more emotional, and our emotions lead to many errors about life. He believed it is our rational thinking, not our emotions or senses, which helps us und...
Throughout the ages art has played a crucial role in life. Art is universal and because art is everywhere, we experience it on a daily basis. From the houses we live in (architecture) to the movies we see (theatre) to the books that we read (literature). Even in ancient culture art has played a crucial role. In prehistoric times cave dwellers drew on the wall of caves to record history. In biblical times paintings recorded the life and death of Christ. Throughout time art has recorded history. Most art is created for a specific reason or purpose, it has a way of expressing ideas and beliefs, and it can record the experiences of all people.