While learning about the many rulers of the Archimedean Empire, two particular conquers peaked my interest. At first, I wondered why both Cyrus and Darius where given the honorific title of ‘The Great’ in an empire that produced so many outstanding rulers. However, after comparing the bureaucratic systems established by both Cyrus II and Darius I, it is revealed that their governances drew many similarities to each other. Through this we can see that Persian kings learnt from their predecessors’ successes and failures and used them to refine their own governing strategies. Cyrus II was beloved conqueror, regarded as father to the Persians,the Lord’s Annointed to the Jews and elect of Marduk to the Babylonians few in history have received such …show more content…
By adopting successful methods of leadership from other rulers and incorporating them into his own administration, Cyrus developed an inclusive empire which proved to be advantageous for both the people themselves the empire at large. Following in Cyrus’ footsteps, Darius adopted many of the governing strategies which where proven to be successful during Cyrus’ reign. Firstly, he streamlined the already successful taxation system which he inherited from his predecessors. Darius’ established a system of satrapy which was designed to prevent corruption- each province was ruled by a handpicked satrap, and safeguarded by royal inspectors. It is clear that Darius recognised the importance of cultural tolerance shown by Cyrus as he tried to emulate a similar accepting attitude in his own reign. His religious tolerance is thus documented by the Persepolis fortification tablets which talk about the sacrifices made by Darius to Persian, Babylonian and Elamite gods. Both Cyrus and Darius where immensely respectful of foreign religions as they recognised the importance of tolerance during their …show more content…
While learning about the event I found the two contesting schools of through - localized vs widespread revolt- immensely fascinating. At a brief glance, I didn’t understand how Weiskopf managed to produce such as convincing argument for his case of localized revolts with such a lack of evidence for the event. However, upon further inspection it is revealed that there’s a number of issues and a lack of evidentiary support for arguments from both sides. One school of through stems from Diodorus original recount of the event which positions the revolt as serious threat to Artaxerxes II empire. Neatly framed within the period of exactly one year between 362-361 BCE, it presented the revolt as a widespread and unified rebellion made by a collective of satraps along with powerful individual in opposition to Artaxerxes II. His only support for the affair comes from Walter Judeich who ‘marshalled the related fragmentary literary documents in order to solidify the primary description of the revolt’. However, both the Athenian Decree at IGII 207’ and epigraphic sources fail to mention anything of a revolt. The second school stems from Michael Weiskopf who argues that The Great Satrap revolts where in actual fact just “a series of local, but
I would describe the Mesopotamians ideal of kingship as courageous and a shepherd of the people. The basis of the monarch’s legacy is his arrogance, courage, beauty, and god like self.
Within 21 years of Xerxes reign to the Persian empire, Xerxes impact and legacy to is questionable from the successes and failures of: the military and administration contributions. From the use of sources such as the Harem inscription “When my father Darius went away from the throne, but the grace of Ahuramazda, I became king on my father’s throne. When I become king, I did much that was excellent. What had been built by my father, I protected, and I added other buildings” is essential and useful in assessing Xerxes’ legacy.
Augustus and Cyrus overlap in positively promoting their efforts to reform and restore the cultural institutions of their Kingdoms and Empires, to improve the livelihoods of their peoples. Both Cyrus in Babylon and Augustus in Rome, ascend to power following upon times of destruction and deterioration. In both first person accounts, the men employ the positive strategy of restoring the culture and in turn the faith of their societies in order to reestablish support for their kingships. Cyrus is poignant in choosing to emphasize, “Daily, I supplied (the temple) [with offerings of x gee]se, two ducks, and ten turtledoves above the former (offerings) of geese, ducks, and turtledoves.” His phrasing shows his desire to place himself above all previous
...ti-colored and multi-raced people, which was something that almost none of the other ancient empires had. It was a peaceful empire and was admired by many people. It had amazing acheivements in goverment, military and communication. It was the largest empire in the Ancient World and was an amazing empire, for the 250 years it lasted. The Persian Empire will be remembered as the largest empire in the ancient world and the most tolerant.
Darius Goes West was a documentary about young man named Darius and his friends as they journey across the U.S. in hopes of raising awareness about Duchenne’s Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and handicap accessibility through the MTV television show Pimp My Ride. The crew and Darius visited a beach on both the East and West coast, the Grand Canyon, the Carlsbad Cavern, the St. Louis Arch, and many other famous attractions of the United States. Right at the beginning of the trip the group stopped at a gas station for a quick pit stop and Darius planned on using the restroom. However, the gas station had no accessibility that allowed Darius to even enter the front door.
Greece and Persia are two of the four great empires that rose to the top rapidly. Both empires have well organized political systems that greatly influenced the way later governments were structured in the United States and Europe. Greece and Persia empire’s structures weighed greatly on their development and growth, but the diverse topographies of Greece and Persia also made a vast impact. These features affected the cultures and even how the political government changed overtime.
The Persian Empire was ruled by Darius the Great from 522 to 485 BCE. He spent years improving administrative organization then worked on expanding the empire. This empire lasted longer than all the others because people could keep their own laws as long as they pay their taxes. The Persian army also allowed more protection from invasions. They used cuneiform writing borrowed from Summerians. More unifying forces they use was Universal System of Weights and Measure, Highway System, Postal service, and Zoroastrianism which was based on individual
From the era of Cyrus the Great to Alexander the Great, Persia had the strongest military, economy, tolerance, and territory needed to deem it a
Prior to Hammurabi the ruler was “Sargon of Akkad”; a revolutionary leader who began his professional life as a minister. Sargon was also an amazing warrior who conquered cities, then put them under his rule. As a result, his armies increased in numbers and power. Sargon found it important to be physically present in each territory and would travel along with his armies from city to city. Unfortunately, these travels were troublesome for the cities which he visited because they had to provide accommodations for him. Sargon seized control of trade routes and resources as a means of generating wealth; this eventually created resentment among the territories. Despite Sargon’s rule, each territory continued to maintain its own laws and way of life. (Bentley and Zeigler, p. 29)
Being an all-powerful leader of a population of any size is a responsibility that many people can hardly fathom, and it has proven to be too much power for most men. This kind of power has negatively affected the well being of the people of many nations throughout history. However, when Cyrus appeared and used his omnipotence for the good of the people, these civilizations prospered in ways that were previously unimaginable. The Persian Empire became the largest of its time, accounting for approximately 49.4 million people, which at the time was about 44% of the world’s population. The Persians, whose empire lasted over 200 years, developed multiple cultures and traditions, because of the diversity of people and belief systems within the Persian Empire. The Persians had taxes, coins, and laws, which helped them continue to become even more efficient, over
He was an architect and statesman for his country and empire. He was a family man, his first wife’s name was Atossa and their son’s name was Xerxes. In Holy Bible of the King James Version, states that Darius boasted saying “I am King of Kings, King of the World.” (King, Darius 1). Christians helped him and he was praised for helping the Jews of Jerusalem. He liked people and often prayed to God while helping the Jews. Darius was a proud, strong, physically fit man. God blessed him but not as much as possibly if he been a true Christian. Darius had not mastered a lot of languages and customs of his empire. Many things were unfamiliar or foreign to him. The Greeks interfered with his empire often. The Greeks and Romans had mastered languages, mathematics, philosophy, writing, reading and a form of Democracy. I think many of the people in his empire was smarter than he was. He lost the final battle with the Greeks and just before he died with the Greeks and the Romans, whom finally over throw Darius son
Alexander the Not so Great:history through Persian eyes by Prof Ali Ansari Paragraph 1 Page
I found that these two nations shared most forms of internal control. I would never advocate for a leader praised as a high god but I believe that these similarities show that there is a good successful way to govern; these methods lead to wealth, and expansion of control. However in the modern world polices that are geared towards the nation as the whole are rarely followed, instead many favor individuals. The rulers of ancient nations understood that is the nation as a whole is successful everyone benefits, including those at the top of the pyramid. Per usual I kept thinking about the relation to the modern world while writing this
Iran was included in the territory of what was then the ancient Persian Empire. For centuries Iran (land of the Aryans) was also referred to as Persia, which was the official name until 1935. Fourteen years had passed before the Iranian government allowed the use of both names. Few groups of people today have significant history like the Iranians, descending from the ancient Persians, who possess one of the world’s richest and oldest cultures. Historically, a variety of other cultures and groups had once occupied the ancient Iranian plateau as early as 4,000 B.C.E, with little importance. Beginning by the third millennium, Persia was ruled by some of the greatest kings of all time, from Cyrus the Great to Darius the III, who turned the Persian Empire into one of the world’s greatest civilizations.
...o the practice of other religions throughout his empire because his religion allowed for him to be a more moral and upright leader. However, Darius was a firm believer in the punishment of evil-doers. This can be seen by the inscription on the relief above the Royal Road, which stated that “The Lie made them rebellious, so that these [men] deceived the people. Afterwards Ahuramazda put them into my hand; as was my desire, so I did unto them (Primary Source, 131).” This supports the idea that Zoroastrianism, created benevolent yet firm political dignitaries.