Comparing The Mask By Angelou And Dunbar

426 Words1 Page

The poetical works of both Maya Angelou and Paul Lawrence Dunbar, "The Mask" and "We Wear the Mask", respectively, both convey agreeing and disagreeing views of personal identity through their voices of emotion. Both speakers mention the necessity of hiding their true identity. Dunbar speaks more to the unity of the mask, hiding a group, whereas Angelou speaks more to her own personal struggle. Both speakers mention outward expression in the face of adversity. Angelou speaks of laughter, whereas Dunbar speaks of smiling. Both speakers cry inwardly when they are suffering. Angelou and Dunbar speak of hiding their true identities in the face of the world and it's adversity. Both authors speak to a communal mask that all men and women wear. Angelou and Dunbar suffer in their lives, so they must wear a mask to hide themselves from the glaring public eye, for the public cannot help them. The mask forms their identity to the world, but they themselves have a personal identity that only those truly close to them know of. In a wider sense, everyone wears a mask; hiding themselves from everyone else. …show more content…

Angelou’s inclusion of onomatopoeia, or her laughter, gives the audience a sense of false hope that she is fine. Throughout “The Mask”, Angelou ironically uses laughter to counteract her own suffering. She speaks to the duplicity of her own emotions, for she cries whenever she thinks about herself and her relatives. Dunbar speaks of smiling outwardly, but crying out to Christ internally. Both speakers talk of the world only seeing them when they are wearing the mask, because the world is too critical at times; the speakers would be

Open Document