Comparing Sparta And Athenian Democracy

779 Words2 Pages

In Ancient Greece, there were two most powerful states Athens and Sparta. These two states has left several gifts to the world and that gifts had variously effected the world. Athens is famous for its highly developed democracy and its veritable cultural revolution. (Pritchard, 2010) They have left democracy behind and now many countries’ government has a governmental form of democracy. Also as there are less wars than past, countries started to have cultural revolution just like Athens. The hypothesis is that throughout the 5th and 6th century BCE the governments of Athens and Sparta were vastly different in their ways of ruling, their beliefs and their laws; it was the Athenian’s development of democracy that has most shaped modern ways of ruling. …show more content…

They had several differences and as they did, their governments had a different style of ruling. To start with, they had different form of government. Athenian had a governmental form called limited democracy while the Spartan had a form called oligarchy with an element of monarchy, democracy and aristocracy. (Athens vs. Sparta, n.d.) Democracy created by the Athens past leader named Cleisthenes, meant rule of the people. It was to gather male citizens in the assembly, known as ekklesia, and give them equal political rights, freedom of speech and opportunity to participate in the political arena. (Cartwright, 2014) Any male citizen could step up in the assembly and help to develop the country. The system was very complicated and the leader was elected annually. Out of all states that had a governmental form of democracy, Athens were certainly the one with most developed democracy. (Government in Athens

Open Document