Comparing Song of Roland, The Life Story of Pavlichenko, and The Prince

2734 Words6 Pages

Comparing Song of Roland, The Life Story of Pavlichenko, and The Prince

Abstract: By evaluating different approaches of rulers to their vassals, in The

Song of Roland and The Life Story of Pavlichenko, Matvey Rodionych, it

is shown that Machiavelli made a mistake when he came up with his

general rule: “It is much safer to be feared than loved, if hi is to fail in

one of the two.” (Machiavelli, 54). Darwin explained in his theory of

natural selection, which primarily explains evolution, however also can be

applied to any other situation in which sustainability is the primary

concern as in ruler – vassal relationships, that only the strongest survived.

Disregarding this fact Machiavelli came up with a false theory.

Charlemagne is loved and succeeds, and only when hated he gets in

danger. Nikitinsky is feared and dies. Both stories suit the condition of

Machiavelli’s rule, and still it fails.

When Darwin came up with his theory of natural selection, he explained

why rulers, once they have acquired power, behave in a certain way that, to

their belief, sustains their position. 1

Approximately 350 years earlier, Niccolò Machiavelli formulated a set of rules which was supposed to support rulers, in

his case the prince of Milan, in doing so. One of his rules is: “It is much safer

for a ruler to be feared than loved, if he is to fail in one of the

two”(Machiavelli, 54). Juxtaposing The Song of Roland and The Life Story of

Pavlichenko, Matvey Rodionych, two stories written on the bases of Ruler –

Vassal relations, it becomes doubtful whether Machiavelli’s theory can be

taken as cornerstone for any ruler’s principles.

The theory of natural selection is widely accepted and will therefore be

taken as fact in this argument. Darwin states in his theory that only the

strongest survive. That suggests that a ruler’s position is only sustainable if he

is stronger than his subjects and adversaries. Stronger in this case can be both,

physically for example through armed forces or even physical strength, and

psychologically for example through the use of superior rhetoric or wit. In

most cases however, a combination of both will be necessary. In examining the

relation of the ruler to his vassals, it is just as important to take into account

other goals the ruler might have besides sustaining his position. His priority

might also be the general well-being and the continuous development of his

Open Document