Comparing Rome And Punic Wars

588 Words2 Pages

To have a clear picture of Carthage, Rome and the motivations of their great rivalry, we must establish that it was a struggle for power, economic, conquest and dominion over the near Italy cities and close to the Northern territories of Africa, where both sides deployed their best men and abilities for war until there was a winner and a loser after fighting the Punic wars which most relevant details and characteristics are explained below.
Comparison between Rome and Carthage
Roman history cannot be told without mentioning Carthage and make comparisons of their power. Carthage was founded by the Phoenicians in the northern coast of Africa in 814 BCE, while Rome was founded by the union of the Etruscan and Latin tribes of the Italian peninsula in 753 BCE as per the documented in the reference. …show more content…

Carthage dominated and conquered the native inhabitants of Africa as Lydian and Numidian as well some Greeks cities in Sicily, Rome by his side dominated and conquered the peoples of the Italian peninsula as the Umbrian, Latins, etc. (Morey, 1901, p. 62), both Rome and Carthage after they were consolidated as powers in their respective territories, wanted to make their respective domains larger and went outside their borders to extend their territories.
Carthage and Rome had a similar form of government in spite of the fact that Carthage was an empire with a monarch, but also had a senate, consuls and a popular assembly like Rome, which being a republic had a dictator, a senate, consuls and a popular assembly, this is strictly speaking about how they were organized to rule according to my opinion because how they applied the government power were very

Open Document