Comparing Poetry In The Trapper's Boast And Fearful Women

1723 Words4 Pages

When someone imagines a poem, the stereotypical love poem or one about the beauty of nature may come to mind first. Possibly, the reflection on one’s life or a personification of death. A poem critiquing the status quo of society likely is not very high upon that list. However, despite this, poems like “The Trapper’s Boast”, “Fearful Women”, or “Masks” demonstrate how poetry is capable of discussing complex, invocative topics in a way meant to incite revolutionary change. Furthermore, poems are capable of doing so in a way that is not easily matched by many other forms of art because poetry is granted inexhaustible length and depth, truthful passion, and valuable clarity in a way that is more easily consumable by the masses. Poetry may be one …show more content…

The criminalized, yet beautiful Helen of Troy is “to blame” for an entire war because “wars for turf/ and profit don't sound glamorous enough (Lines 4, 5-6). She became such a figurehead that admitting what the Trojan War was about anything else stripped practically any reason to continue the fight. Joan of Arc -- a revolutionary woman granted sainthood status -- mentioned later in the poem is “burnt to a cinder”, while “Darby's Joan…” -- or a comfortably passive, elderly, British woman -- [is] content with church and Kinder” (Line 21-22). Carolyn Kizer shows how powerful, iconic women within Western women were persecuted for their existence while the serial rapist Zeus and cowardly Adam, who refused to support Eve or seek understanding, are still revered and respected for theirs. “Mythologize your women!” Kizer declares, “None escape” (Line 7). Kizer addresses how no woman -- regardless of beauty, intelligence, or valor -- is free from the harmful societal expectations of them, even today. Women are still expected to be passively kind, moderately intelligent, and -- hopefully -- not intimidatingly attractive or else no one could ever love or accept them. Kizer shows how a poet can manipulate any classic story into a piece of art, and in this …show more content…

Poetry allows a passion -- either reserved or fiery -- that is able to communicate the types of powerful emotions necessary to incite the desire for change guided by a social commentary. A good poem is capable of describing events -- like a slave trapper looking for his next victim or two people in need of someone like them -- that a painting or song lacks the freedom to do. A poem is not bound by existing only in words. Silverstein’s “Masks” demonstrates this. Even for a poem that lacks a visual aid, like “Fearful Women” and “The Trapper’s Boast”, the poems create a significant progression of images in the mind of the reader. Poets carefully lay out the sequence of images and events that leads the reader to reach the conclusion already made by the writer. Additionally, the clarity poetry has -- granted by its capacity for great depth -- while working as a social commentary is a huge benefit that would be lost by pure artistic interpretation. There is not much room for debate about what a poem like “Fearful Women” is about, Kizer does not paint an admirative view of the long running portrayals of men or women. This is due to the ability Kizer has to detail, in length, these views and provide clear, widely-known examples. Such a thing would not be done so interestingly in an essay or book, nor be

Open Document