Comparing Brooker's The Tragical History Of Romeo And Juliet

443 Words1 Page

Between these two poems theirs all kinds of differences from the version of Arthur Brooker´s The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet, which this book was published a long time ago in the year of 1562. The version that Shakespeare’s did was published in the year of 1597. Which both of these had 35 years apart when they were published so one of the major differences in these two versions is that the first version by Shakespeare was called The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet and the version of Arthur Brooke is called The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet, so that's one of the first differences between these two versions that they have different but pretty similar titles. Another difference is that in both of them the way that they would spell the words since I'm pretty sure he didn't copy his work word by word he had to have a couple of changes like in the way that he spells and writes the words since Shakespeare version had come out 35 years after the original version had come out. …show more content…

I didn't know this till I read both of the titles of the stories/poems that where I found this information. Also, I made some research and in the version of Shakespeare, he decided to lower Juliet's age in the book he decides to do this because he thinks that Juliet was too young to be a bride. So you are probably wondering what are some easy similarities in both of the versions. Probably the easiest version is that Romeo/Romeus falls deeply in love with

Open Document