Compare The Destroy Your Business Strategy And The DYB Strategy

1060 Words3 Pages

Contrasting and comparing the GYB and DYB strategies The Destroy Your Business strategy (DYB) entails a strategic plan developed, and implemented by the company leadership, and employees. The plan is to destroy a company 's weaknesses, as well as business units that are less beneficial or do not add value to the enterprise 's performance. The DYB strategy is essential in the sense that if a company does not identify and crush its weaknesses, competitors will use those weaknesses to their advantage. On the other hand, the Grow Your Business strategy (GYB) entails finding innovative ways of reaching new clients and better ways to serve the existing ones. Thus, the DYB strategy helps in completely disrupting the current practices of a business …show more content…

The protection enhances the ability of sustaining a business in a competitive marketplace for the long run. A firm should also undergo the DYB strategy to get rid of business units and other resources that do not add value to the company 's performance. It should adopt the GYB strategy, in which it would utilize the business opportunities lying at its disposal to its advantage. As a direct result of these two strategies, the company would gain a substantial competitive edge against rivals, as well as boost its profitability in the long run (Grimm, Lee & Smith, 2010). Knowing that today 's business environment is characterized by heightened competition that has led to extensive gaps between industry leaders and laggards, and that there are greater churns among the industry rivals, the GYB and DYB strategies are essential for any modern company. More importantly, the GYB strategy should be focused towards the increase of …show more content…

Thus, cannibalization strategy occurs when a newly developed product encroaches on the current market for the existing product, as opposed to expanding a company 's market base. The company could have intended that the new product would appeal to a new market segment and increase market share. However, the new product ends up appealing to the firm 's current market, which results in reduced market share and sales volume of the existing product. At the bottom line, the DYB strategy is far more effective than the cannibalization strategy with respect to the competitiveness, growth and market leadership of a company. It is because the DYB strategy is developed, designed and implemented to boost the business 's competitive advantage. The cannibalization strategy ultimately forces the life of an existing product to end prematurely, as sales shift to a new product, as opposed to tapping into new market segments as intended. One of the examples where cannibalization strategy occurred is when Apple developed the more quality-rich iPods and iPhones that depleted the sales of its lower-end iPhones and iPods, such as shuffle, nano and classic series. These were unintended plans, which also reduced the company 's sales performance. For example, consider the GYB strategy as far better than the cannibalization strategy, as is the case of

Open Document