Compare And Contrast The Code Of Hammurabi

1762 Words4 Pages

Comparing and Contrasting Two Hammurabi code of law Paintings. In my Final Project I will begin comparing the two works of art and consider how the themes which I have chosen and they both share finds discoveries in contemporary ideas of events that have happened. The visual works of art is by L.W. King that is titled The Code of Hammurabi. The Code of Hammurabi was painted in approximately 1790 B.C in Parson, France and represents a Editio princeps painting style. The Code of Hammurabi was written in a style that is only used in sculptures and inscriptions with formal or solemn character, the laws were made in a more simplified style called ancient Babylon italics are written in short columns that is read from the top down.
¥ Contrast & Compare--- …show more content…

One’s focus is horizontal, while the other’s is vertical. Archaeologist Alfred Hoerth, author of Archaeology and the Old Testament, says, “The Old Testament law code is religiously oriented, while others are civil. The Mesopotamians believed the god Shamash gave Hammurabi his law code so people could get along with one another. In the Bible, the law code was given primarily so people could get along with God.”---
--.I will compare the themes and tones of the works of art, as well as the experiences and attitudes of the main roles of each individual that represents the paintings in the above paintings. I will connect these to the experiences of the believers, that particular in those who have had their faith disputed by some ideas, theories, and some events in the world today. --

The Stele Law Code of Hammurabi, an ancient Babylonian artifact, is a slightly over seven-foot sculpture made from diorite and engraved with the code of laws written by L.W. King Hammurabi of Babylon. This code of laws was written to cover just about any possible type of law for general society, particularly as dealing with criminal acts. This set of laws primitively dictated by King Hammurabi had to be rendered into several different languages around the empire, but the stele engraved with it is one of the greatest records we have of Babylonian …show more content…

The discrepancy between Mosaic Law and the Hammurabi Code are equally important. For example, the Law of Moses went far beyond the Code of Hammurabi in that it was entrenched in the worship of one God, supreme over all (Deuteronomy 6:4-5). The moral predominant of the Old Testament are based on a conscientious God who demanded that mankind, created in His image, live equitably. The Law of Moses is more than a legal code; it speaks of sin and authority to God. The Hammurabi Code and other ancient laws do not do this. Hammurabi claimed to receive his code from the Babylonian god of justice, Shamash. Moses received God’s Law a top Mount Sinai precisely from Jehovah, the God of the Israelites. The Code of Hammurabi focused exclusively on criminal and civil laws and meted out harsh, and sometimes brutal, discipline. In this way, Hammurabi has more in common with Draco than with Moses. The Law of Moses contributed justice, but it also dealt with spiritual laws and personal and national holiness. As a result, the Mosaic Law dealt with the cause of crime, not just its effects. The Mosaic Law elevates the value of human life, and its whole tenor is more sympathetic than that of the Hammurabi Code. The spiritual dimension is what makes the Law of Moses exclusive. The black stone stela containing Hammurabi’s Code was carved from a single, four-ton slab of diorite, a durable but incredibly

Open Document