Hammurabi Code Essay

959 Words2 Pages

In the ancient times Babylonian king, Hammurabi, formed his code of laws, in the year 1750 BC. The code of Hammurabi consisted of 282 laws that were engraved in stone; this made the King believe the laws came directly from the sun god. Unlike earlier laws the code was written in Akkadian language, which was the common language of Babylon. The purpose of the code was to use governmental authority to make common bonds among the people of the Babylonian society.
The construction of the code is very precise, for each crime committed there was a specific punishment. The punishments were usually extremely harsh by current standards. Many of the offences resulted in death, deformity or the use of “Law of Retaliation philosophy”(tooth for tooth, eye for eye). Also some laws in the code mention to jump in the Euphrates River to show one's remorse or purity. If the accused returned to the land safely, they were considered innocent, if they drowned they were guilty. This practice makes the Babylonians believe that their destinies were in the hands of their gods. The code outlines rules for observers and those making allegations of crimes. In Illustration, "If any one bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to death." The code gives details on how stealing or destruction of property should be handled, and also gives instructions for dealing with business/trade problems. The code affects to the entire Babylonian society. The punishments of the code was different for everyone, it depended on the status of the victim. The patricians, who were the free men and women, the plebeians, who were the commoners, and the slaves, were the classes i...

... middle of paper ...

...d all the Christians who did not follow his code.
The code of Hammurabi, Draco, and Diocletian was similar in terms of the cruelty of punishments. They were all punished for minor offences and the poor people did not have a lot of rights. Their codes were based on harsh punishments in order to limit the number of crimes committed in Athens. These codes mostly benefited the rich who could read and understand what the code meant. Solon on the other hand was relatively a generous leader who was fair to all classes. He got hid of cruel punishments for minor offences, he only used the previous codes for homicide crimes. He freed the poor people from debt and slavery that never happened until his reign. He was concerned with social equality and also he wanted the poor people of Athens to live their life without any obligations to the rich unlike the other three rulers.

Open Document