Compare And Contrast Informal And Informal Imperialism

640 Words2 Pages

Writing 2 1.Imperialism is a process of having power over other significant territories. Having this power can be combined into different types of control such as; direct rule, indirect rule and informal imperialism. Direct rule is a method of management of an authority within a type of government. Next, indirect rule allows local leaders to make important decisions regarding the government. Finally, Informal Imperialism allows the weaker states to uphold the stronger states by controlling their self-government. 2.After the loss of territory in the Americas, attention shifted to developing nations and territories that were more vulnerable to the European nations. There was a mix of economic pressures and strategic/nationalist …show more content…

Kipling wrote this in order to show the European imperialism and the obligation of the civilization. In other words, "The White Man's Burden" is showing that white men have an obligation to rule/encourage the civilizations development as a whole and to be in demand. 1.If the citizens of the occupied territory fulfill their obligated duty to the white man, "their captor," they will be given security and structure within their society by the dominant governing body. They will be fed, clothed, and cared for if they are sick. The people will be given form versus what they had previous to being occupied: chaos. However, the white man ultimately benefits by ruling over these vulnerable territories. 2.The "burden" was being under the white man's rule and what came with that predicament. There were benefits but there were also many consequences. These include the sacrifice of life in the name of the imperial nation, toil and endless labor, and unimaginable oppression. "Take up the White Man's burden – send forth the best ye breed – Go, bind your sons to exile To serve your captives' need." (756) Those living under the yolk of imperialism bore this burden; "The White Man's

Open Document