Compare And Contrast Essay On Flowers For Algernon

890 Words2 Pages

Charlie vs. Doctors

“Intelligence without ambition is like a bird without wings.” -Salvador Dali. Throughout the story, Charlie Gordon experiences life and learns many valuable lessons. All he wanted was to be intelligent and have friends, and he definitely had the motivation. Before the procedure, he had an IQ of sixty-eight, and after, it was tripled to two hundred and four. But now, Charlie is going to die because of the results from the surgery. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur made a poor decision by choosing Charlie Gordon as the test subject for the intelligence-changing procedure.

Charlie should not have taken place in this surgery because he would still end up being an outcast. His motivation …show more content…

Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss picked Charlie for the experiment because they knew he was gullible and he would not understand the risks. When Charlie was talking about the doctors, he quoted, “He said I had a good motor-vation. I never even knew I had that” (Keyes 185). Charlie often times takes things literally and does not have a wide set vocabulary. The Belmont Report also states that the subject can not have diminished autonomy, which means a person has to be able to do things and make decisions on their own. They have to be self-reliant. Charlie has a hard time reading, writing, and especially spelling. He noted in a journal entry, “He rote somthing down on a paper and I got skared of faling the test” (Keyes 183). If Charlie can not even spell, how can he be able to do things solely on his own? If he can not be an independent person, he should be ineligible for the surgery. Others may say that it is Charlie’s fault for not wanting to know more about the risks, for not asking more questions. Once again they are wrong. Charlie is stupid, vulnerable, and is easy to take an advantage of. He states that the doctors say he has “good motor-vation” (Keyes 185). Charlie easily misunderstands concepts, which shows there is no way he could have understood all the dangers of the surgery. Being so naive made Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur’s job of finding a willing patient …show more content…

On Progress Report 13, Charlie says, “I visited the lab to see him as I do occasionally, and when I took him out of his cage, he snapped at my hand” (Keyes 203). Slowly, Algernon begins to deteriorate, which makes Charlie realize that his knowledge is only temporary. Then Algernon dies, which leads Charlie to conclude that the same things will happen to him. Charlie says, “Anyway I bet Im the first dumb person in the world who ever found out something importent for sience” (Keyes 210). It is not that he is saying he is going to die, but the tone of his sentence seems very negative. Charlie sounds as if he is giving up on his knowledge because he knows it is not worth it, because he knows he is going to die. Arguing that his death will be okay because he made contributions to science is disrespectful and just wrong. In addition, the Belmont Report states that “We can not sacrifice humans for scientific advancements” (Belmont Report). The doctors knew the dangers of the surgery, yet they failed to communicate with Charlie how severe those dangers were. They risked Charlie for science, for their own

Open Document