Argumentative Essay: Daniel Keyes Flowers For Algernon

425 Words1 Page

“Flowers for Algernon” Argumentative Essay Charlie Gordon should have not had the surgery. The story is titled “Flowers for Algernon” The author is Daniel Keyes. The same problems Charlie had are ones that mentally impaired people deal with in reality. Society believed that all the Charlies in the world would have to be fixed. Charlie understood several things when he became smarter after the surgery occurred. There is no need for Charlie to change to please others. The reality was that Charlie’s societal conflicts were true. In this science fictional story, Frank and Joe are not his real best friends. Frank and Joe created a petition at work to attempt to have Charlie fired from his job. Charlie’s “best friends” made several cruel jokes about Charlie, such as “Pulled a Charlie Gordon”. That phrase means that someone has made a mistake, or something that Charlie would do without being aware. Throughout the story, Charlie will continue to face all the problems society throws at him. Being mentally impaired, Charlie had to be repaired. Charlie wanted the doctors to use him in their experiment. He wanted to know what it felt like to be smart, and to finally understand the things in life that he had not before. Meanwhile Charlie has received this once in a lifetime opportunity, the operation superseded his life. Charlie was a human being but to the …show more content…

Obviously, the surgery had not succeeded. Since Algernon died, Charlie realistically could expect his own demise. Although Charlie’s intellect soared beyond specified predictions, the unsuccessfulness of the surgery- quite shocking, for Charlie - was uncontrollable variable! The doctors opportunists, could not reify, remedy, this traumatic outcome. Only Charlie, the genius, could analyze the surgery’s problematic components. At this point, Charlie did not regret the surgery; nevertheless, he should not have been the experimental

Open Document