“I don 't know the question, but sex is definitely the answer.” This unambiguous quote, stated by actor and comedian, Woody Allen, can open a world full of questions, especially after reading two particular pieces of literature. William Faulkner, the author of “A Rose for Emily,” and Andrew Marvel, the author of “To His Coy Mistress,” have both composed works of seduction, and although the similarities between these two storylines are striking, their dialogues and approaches completely differ. They both illustrate a similar situation where both characters, Miss Emily and the unnamed narrator, crave for sexual intimacy. After reading the two texts, many questions arise. How does one sexually appeal to a corpse? Will a person literally do everything …show more content…
Using this choice of words like “then worms shall try” and “…turn to dust”, the speaker essentially tells his mistress that there will be consequences if she does not engage with him. He believes his wit will gain control over his mistress, and her “coyness” will inevitably disappear. In his mind, the repercussions are if she dies without having sex with him, the worms will take her virginity, which can be considered as phallic imagery. In the lines, the worms symbolically mirror the narrator’s male sexual organ. Marvell creates an interesting approach with this daring and disturbing language because the appealing strategy grasps the reader’s attention and explores the question of the extent a person will go to fulfill their sexual desires. While discussing this proposed tight-lipped subject, the tone of the narrator in “To His Coy Mistress” greatly differs from the narrator’s tone in “A Rose for Emily.” The readers can perceive that Marvell’s speaker is intelligent and informed in the sexual category because of his style and word choice. He creates a relaxed tone with his audience, which makes the readers feel comfortable, and he is very clear about what he writes. The direction of the arguments he makes is very undeviating because he goes straight into what he wants …show more content…
Both works relate to each other seeing that they have the same theme, the idea of a physical relationship, but they lay out their arguments in difference manners. Although Homer becomes Emily’s victim, and the mistress becomes the unnamed speaker’s victim, the speaker in “To His Coy Mistress” never killed his target neither did he actually sleep with her corpse, although he alluded to it. This ultimately makes Emily’s character more disturbing than the unnamed speaker because the distinction between the two characters makes the phrase, “actions speak louder than words” very literal. Although the two arguments altogether collaborate with each other and are very conclusive, they still do not propose a feasible solution to the fulfilling sexual wishes. Both speakers have chosen a quick fix to their problems. Granted this, the approaches to their “prey” have obvious differences. The speaker of “To His Coy Mistress” uses his words to lure his mistress while Emily goes beyond that, using her strength of mind and reclusiveness. Another obvious difference between the two is their timelines. Faulkner begins his piece of work with a “throwback” narrative about the main character, Emily, who has lost her father. The timeline constantly spins from present to past over the span of almost 75 years. It takes a real dissection of the story to figure out the exact series of
When faced with a traumatic experience, one’s true nature reveals itself. The trauma forces those suffering from it to cope. How one copes is directly linked to their personality. Some will push everything away, while others will hold whatever they can close. Both of these coping mechanisms can be observed in the two short stories “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” by Katherine Anne Porter and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner. In “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” and “A Rose for Emily,” the two protagonists prominent characteristics distinctly affect the way the protagonists copes when faced with trauma and the outcome of the short stories endings. To begin, Granny Weatherall is a prideful control freak. While, in contrast, Miss Emily is delusional and stubborn.
A rose for Emily and Lamb to The Slaughter are both books about two females getting rejected to the men they love, and the way they get revenge was by killing them. Emily was a shy type of person but she came from a family that are known to be crazy and do crazy things. She fell in love with Mr. Grierson she met when he was doing construction work next to her house. Eventually she married him but not knowing that he is more attracted to men and for that reason she killed him. Mary was in a situation where her husband Patrick did love her but he decided he wanted to leave her for another woman when Mary was pregnant with his baby. This leading up to her killing over the anger she had towards him. The purpose of this is because both females have had the feeling of rejection, and revenge. Emily’s husband was attracted to other men which made her feel rejected because she knew she wasn’t going to be love by Mr. Grierson as much since he doesn’t find her attractive. For Mary, her husband Patrick did love but he wanted to leave her for another woman because he didn’t love her anymore.
In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner both main characters are portrayed as irrational and are isolated from reality. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” murders an elderly man, as he is fearful of the man’s eye. Emily Grierson in “A Rose for Emily” lives secluded from society, until she marries a man, Homer. She ultimately kills Homer in his bed and leaves his body to decompose for many years. Both the narrator in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” and Emily Grierson in William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” deny reality so vehemently that they isolate themselves from reality. Their isolation and denial of reality cause both to commit murder.
In the short stories “A Rose For Emily,” by William Faulkner and “The Possibility of Evil,” by Shirley Jackson both authors create similar characters and settings that illustrate daring images of evil. Both Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth are women who share similar characteristics yet pose completely different motives. Their stories take place in close-knit towns, which play essential roles in their motives for evil. Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth demonstrate similarities and differences that develop their actions, revealing the possibility of evil within them.
Emily was drove crazy by others expectations, and her loneliness. ““A Rose for Emily,” a story of love and obsession, love, and death, is undoubtedly the most famous one among Faulkner’s more than one hundred short stories. It tells of a tragedy of a screwy southern lady Emily Grierson who is driven from stem to stern by the worldly tradition and desires to possess her lover by poisoning him and keeping his corpse in her isolated house.” (Yang, A Road to Destruction and Self Destruction: The Same Fate of Emily and Elly, Proquest) When she was young her father chased away any would be suitors. He was convinced no one was good enough for her. Emily ended up unmarried. She had come to depend on her father. When he finally died, ...
...e Browning’s poem is about a duke simply annoyed by his duchess enjoying everything and disrespecting his nine hundred name. In Faulkner’s short story theme is the decline of the old south. However, they are similar in how they both sort of involve obsession, control, jealousy, pride, and death. Emily Grierson and the duke of Ferrara are not too different. Perhaps one could say they would make a perfect couple since Emily’s life has always be controlled by her father. In addition, the duke would be happy to control her life. They’re both obsessed over different things, jealous of their lover, prideful in different ways. Furthermore, they had secrets and their secrets was that they were involved in their lovers’ death. Emily Grierson did not change and ended up dying. While the duke is focusing on his next victim which foreshadows another death that could take place.
Both ¡§A Rose for Emily¡¨ and ¡§Barn Burning¡¨ address the influence of a father, and the protagonists of both stories make their own decisions. Miss Emily lives with her father who prevents her from dating with any young man until she is thirty. Her father¡¦s deed enhances her thirst for love and security. After her father died, she finally has the freedom of love. When she meets Homer Barron and thinks that she has found her true love. But opposite of what she wants, Homer is a homosexual: ¡§¡Khe liked men, and it was known that he drank with the younger men in the Elks¡¦ Club --- that he was not a marrying man¡¨ (¡§A Rose for Emily¡¨, 126). To keep him with her forever, Miss Emily chooses to murder Homer. ¡§Then we noticed that in the second pillow was the indentation of a head. One of us lifted something from it, and learning forward, we saw a long strand of iron-gray hair¡¨ (¡§A Rose for Emily¡¨, 130), Faulkner implies that Miss Emily actually sleeps with the corpse. She must love Homer deeply, to endure the rotten smell and appearance of the dead body. She even enjoys being with it. ¡§The body had apparently once lain in the attitude of an embrace¡¨ (¡§A Rose for Emily¡¨, 130). Although she picks the most ridiculous way to express love, her courage to choose her own way of life compels admiration.
“A Rose for Emily” and “The Yellow Wallpaper” take place in an era that favours male hierarchy and ordains women by implying inferiority. In “A Rose for Emily”, the male is represented as very powerful and dominating, and in Emily’s case, it is her father. There is a brief description of him next to Emily that the narrator reveals, “Miss Emily a slender figure in white in the background, her father a spraddled silhouette in the foreground, his back to her and clutching a horsewhip, the two of them framed by the back-flung front door” (Faulkner, 142). This imagery of the father with the whip next to a fragile Emily against a white background helps the reader visualize the dominating nature of their relationship. Similarly, “The Yellow Wallpaper” conveys the inequalities that exist between men and women, the mistreatment and lack of respect women receive from the society. However, the discrimination of women is seen as a “condition” through the eyes of the narrator. Thus, she begins to belie...
Three key elements link William Faulkner's two short stories "A Rose for Emily" and "Dry September": sex, death, and women (King 203). Staging his two stories against a backdrop of stereotypical characters and a southern code of honor, Faulkner deliberately withholds important details, fragments chronological times, and fuses the past with the present to imply the character's act and motivation.
William Faulkner is widely considered to be one of the great American authors of the twentieth century. Although his greatest works are identified with a particular region and time (Mississippi in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries), the themes he explores are universal. He was also an extremely accomplished writer in a technical sense. Novels such as The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! feature bold experimentation with shifts in time and narrative. Several of his short stories are favorites of anthologists, including "A Rose for Emily." This strange story of love, obsession, and death is a favorite among both readers and critics. The narrator, speaking for the town of Jefferson in Faulkner's fictional Yoknapatawpha County, Mississippi, tells a series of stories about the town's reclusive spinster, Miss Emily Grierson. The stories build up to a gruesome revelation after Miss Emily's funeral. She apparently poisoned her lover, Homer Barron, and kept his corpse in an attic bedroom for over forty years. It is a common critical cliche to say that a story "exists on many levels." In the case of "A Rose for Emily", this is the truth. Critic Frank A. Littler, in an essay published in Notes on Mississippi Writers regarding the chronology of the story, writes that "A Rose for Emily" has been read variously as ". . .a Gothic horror tale, a study in abnormal psychology, an allegory of the relations between North and South, a meditation on the nature of time, and a tragedy with Emily as a sort of tragic heroine." These various interpretations serve as a good starting point for discussion of the story.
A motif is any element in a story that is repeated and as a result of that repetition takes on some added significance. One motif in William Fulkner’s short story, “A Rose For Emily” is the townspeople’s view of Miss Emily appearing to be like a statue. This creates the idea that she is an idol throughout the town rather than a normal human being. Throughout her entire life, Emily is watched by the people in the town where she lives. Instead of making a real relationship with her or trying to make a deep connection with her, the citizens of the town watch her from a distance, making up their own interpretation of who Miss Emily really is. They think they know her personality and ways of life, but at the end of the story, the townspeople discover
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily uses setting, characterization, and figurative language to show us how old money is selfish and responsible with their money and how new money is selfless, but uses their money unwisely.
Miss Emily has lost grip on reality and her passion for finding love has driven her mad. This began when her father refused to let her find a suitable mate. He watched her every move and stole most of her life away from her. Her thirst for finding companionship was so alarming that she began to support her false reality of murdering Homer Barron and hiding his corpse in her bedroom for decades. Miss Emily’s passion convinced herself that her actions were normal, that necrophilia is a normal condition. Passion is not necessarily always a good thing. There is a huge difference between one looking for companionship and one turning to necrophilia for pleasure. “A Rose for Emily” and “Fire In The Blood” both possess some similarities. For instance, the main characters from both stories craved love. They were all blinded by this and believed their actions did not come with any consequence or a feeling of regret. Both stories also differed from each other. “A Rose for Emily” looked at passion from a different perspective. From a view when love clouds one’s judgment and drives one insane. Faulkner showed the readers that there is a fine line between passion and
William Faulkner used indirect characterization to portray Miss Emily as a stubborn, overly attached, and introverted women through the serious of events that happened throughout her lifetime. The author cleverly achieves this by mentioning her father’s death, Homer’s disappearance, the town’s taxes, and Emily’s reactions to all of these events. Emily’s reactions are what allowed the readers to portray her characteristics, as Faulkner would want her to be
In "A Rose for Emily," William Faulkner's use of setting and characterization foreshadows and builds up to the climax of the story. His use of metaphors prepares the reader for the bittersweet ending. A theme of respectability and the loss of, is threaded throughout the story. Appropriately, the story begins with death, flashes back to the past and hints towards the demise of a woman and the traditions of the past she personifies. Faulkner has carefully crafted a multi-layered masterpiece, and he uses setting, characterization, and theme to move it along.