Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
First impressions on claudius essay
First impressions on claudius essay
First impressions on claudius essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Marc Falcon
Professor John Bauschatz
Classic 160 B1:
11/27/15
Claudius Letter to the Alexandrians Claudius letter to the Alexandrians was a valuable piece in Roman history that has given a personal insight into the social and political scene of Alexandria. Much has been said about the Jewish people of Alexandria, the most influential, as well as the most outspoken people in the community. Yet, the principal problem, which has provoked the publication of violent riots is the civic status that surrounds the Jewish people. While Claudius first discusses the statues, monuments, and temples that were given in his honor, he goes on to give his thoughts concerning the Jewish and Greek communities in Alexandria. From his decree we can infer that
…show more content…
Claudius calls the conflict a riot “against the Jews,” rather than a conflict between the Jews and Greeks. Claudius defends the Jews’ right to practice their religion freely and live freely as part of the community, but while he does protect their basic rights, he denies them equivalent status to the Greek elite. Claudius asks the Greeks to “conduct themselves more gently and …. In Claudius Letter to the Alexandrians his main purpose is to reaffirmed Jewish rights in the city but also to forbade them to move in more families en masse. This brought great attention to the ideas of helping the city of Alexandria to prosper by respecting the rights of people while also limiting the amount of cultural aspects by reducing the migration of Jewish people into the city of …show more content…
The unrest to which he refers was unrest between the Greek and Jewish communities of the city, not within the Jewish community. The Jews who were sailing in from Syria are placed on the same footing as the Jews who sailed down the Nile to Alexandria from other parts of Egypt. There were many Jews in Egypt apart from those of Alexandria, but they did not enjoy the special privileges granted to their brethren in Alexandria. The significance of the illegal Jewish immigration into Alexandria from Syria and the rest of Egypt is probably to be found in the statement of Josephus that the Jews of Alexandria, having obtained no satisfaction from Gaius, took up arms when the news of his death arrived. That is to say, they prepared to attack the Greek Alexandrines, and in these circumstances it was only natural that they should try to augment their strength by inviting their fellow-Jews from other parts of Egypt and from Syria and Palestine to come to their aid. Such a situation would amply account for the severity of the emperor’s admonition to stop this at
Julius was born from Aurelia and Gaius Julius Caesar. His family had nobility status, although they were neither rich nor influential in the time period. Caesar was made military tribune before 70 B.C. and was quaestor in Farther Spain in 69 B.C. he helped Pompey to obtain the supreme command for the war in the East. As a general, Caesar was the best Rome had ever seen. He returned to Rome in 68 B.C. and in Pompey's absence was becoming the recognized head of the popular party. His love of Marius and Cinna made him popular with the people, but earned him the hatred of the senate. In Dec. 63 B.C. Caesar advocated mercy for Catiline and the conspirators, thereby increasing the enmity of the senatorial party and its leaders, Cato the Younger and Quintus Lutatius Catulus.
Livy’s The Rise of Rome serves as the ultimate catalogue of Roman history, elaborating on the accomplishments of each king and set of consuls through the ages of its vast empire. In the first five books, Livy lays the groundwork for the history of Rome and sets forth a model for all of Rome to follow. For him, the “special and salutary benefit of the study of history is to behold evidence of every sort of behaviour set forth as on a splendid memorial; from it you may select for yourself and for your country what to emulate, from it what to avoid, whether basely begun or basely concluded.” (Livy 4). Livy, however, denies the general populace the right to make the same sort of conclusions that he made in constructing his histories. His biased representation of Romulus and Tarquin Superbus, two icons of Roman history, give the readers a definite model of what a Roman should be, instead of allowing them to come to their own conclusion.
On that first fateful day, when Romulus struck down his own brother Remus, the cauldron of Rome was forged in blood and betrayal. The seeds on the Palatine hill cultured one of the most potent and stretching empires of human history. Though this civilization seemingly wielded the bolts of Zeus, they were infested with violence, vanity, and deception. Yet, one man—or seemingly “un”-man—outshone and out-graced his surroundings and everyone within it. He brought Rome several victories and rescued his beloved country from an early exodus, thus providing her a second beginning. This man was Marcus Furius Camillus, and against a logical and emotional mind, he was oft less than loved and celebrated. At times he was disregarded, insulted and even exiled—irrevocably an unwarranted method to reward Rome’s “Second Founder.” This contrast of character between hero and people was perhaps too drastic and too grand. The people were not yet ready to see Marcus Furius Camillus as a model of behavior to be emulated—to be reproduced. Hence, much of Livy’s Book 5 provides a foundation for the Roman people to imitate and assimilate a contrasting, honest, and strong behavior and temperament
The Romans and therefore Josephus who is an integrated part of their collation by this time thought that if they (the rebels) were indeed to come to their senses, the Romans would help in the preservation of the marvel that is the Jewish temple. Josephus makes this one point abundantly clear that the Romans were more than willing despite their dislike of the Jewish people, in general, to help save something they found magnificent and to a significant part they wanted for themselves. “…He would not make war on inanimate objects instead of men, or, whatever happened, burn down such a work of art: it was the Romans who would lose thereby, just as their empire would gain an ornament if it was preserved.” The Romans and thus Josephus put almost
When we think of the great empires of the past, the one that probably influenced western culture the most, would have to be the Roman Empire. It was so large that at the height of it’s power, the Roman Empire encompassed all of the Mediterranean sea going as far north as Britain, and as far east as ancient Babylon. Many different people groups and cultures were affected by the Roman Empire. They built many great wonders, many roads to connect the empire, and achieved many great feats through the might of their Empire. All of these things were possible because of one reason, the Roman military was the most dominant, cohesive, brilliant fighting force the world had ever seen. The Roman army made every great accomplishment of the empire possible. But there was a time when the Roman Republic was not powerful at all. It’s military reflected that, it was a mere collection of land holders that would fight only when needed. There was no professional force to speak of. But as time progresses and the Roman Republic evolved, so too did her military. And this transformation was due to one man, Gaius Marius. Gaius took the Roman Army and radically changed every aspect of them. He created a full time, professional army of disciplined men. And organized them into the famous legions. Without the reforms of Gaius Marius, the great Roman Empire that we all know and have studied, never would have existed.
In my opinion this book is not the evaluation of how approximately fifty million people from two thousand years ago thought about the world that they lived in at the time, but about how a few dozen men wrote about it, in a viewpoint illustrative of only a few thousand. In order to support her view, Edith Hamilton tries to bring these people together, threading together their common thoughts and ideologies. Save for the fact that this book only represents a handful of Roman citizens and the way that they saw the world in which they lived, I do feel like I got a better understanding of the “Roman Way” and the way that life was back then. Along with the history that I learned in class on the subject it makes me be able to picture it better in my mind’s-eye.
This is not to say that Caesar did not support those of the patrician class, in fact he was more than generous to those of a higher class. He supported Hortalus, grandson of the orator Hortensius, by giving him one million sesterces in order to maintain the family’s position (Tacitus, Annals 2.37, cited by R. Ridley, 2003), and this was not the only example of his giving to patricians. We must then consider why he emphasizes his generosity to the common people, and I think that the key to this is the placement of the source. Res Gestae was inscribed upon pillars in a public area- it was designed to be seen by those of all classes, not just those of a higher class, like many forms of literature were in Augustus’ era. He wants those who will see his work to look upon him in a favourable light, and the best way for Augustus to achieve this was to make himself out to be a friend to the common people.
Andreas, son of John, was in Jerusalem when an outbreak occurred. Andreas had come up from Sepphoris in Galilee for Pentecost to visit an old friend, Barabbas, when he noticed Roman soldiers dressed as normal citizens; they had then pulled out their clubs and started hitting people during the demonstration. The demonstration was for Pilate, and Andreas just happened to get into the middle of all the action. “The demonstration was because Pilate wanted to take money from the temple treasury to build a new aqueduct for Jerusalem” (4). The Romans captured people from the demonstration that they suspected for having ties with the terrorists Bannus and Barabbas. While being interrogated about the demonstration, Andreas is given a choice, to both further prosecution and imprisonment or to gather information for the Romans about rising movements that might take over the land.
King Claudius' Speech I will be comparing and contrasting the impression that we get of the new King Claudius. I will be doing this by looking at his first speech and the speech in Act 3, Scene III. Claudius’s rather dramatic opening speech (II.1) appears to be relaxed, eloquent and confident, but its careful structure indicates that the speech is well rehearsed. The style of his first extended speech is open to interpretation; he can be portrayed as overly confident about his marriage, referring to Hamlet as his “cousin” and “son” and his kingship; insecure about his marriage, referring to Gertrude as “th’imperial jointress”; crafty and devious, speaking of Hamlet’s death with no real sorrow or observably fake sadness; or unsure of his role as King; he begins his first Royal speech by speaking at length on personal matters – this could be seen more as small talk than anything else. The reaction of his court can also be seen as ambiguous – his subjects are portrayed as respecting their new King, declaring “In that an...
Throughout the rise of early Christianity in rome persecution ranged from commoners to emperors and was a common practice. The unfair oppression of Christians came from a place of fear from the emperors, However the commoners believed Christians disrespected the rank of the gods. Because of the inferior label put on Christians and their “shameful” behavior during this time persecution was an ongoing sequence.
4)Rosenstein, Nathan Stewart., and Robert Morstein-Marx. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2006. Print.
Julius Caesar mirrors the lives of a broad base of tragic heroes, much like Abraham Lincoln and Napoleon Bonaparte. In addition to fighting or helping the wars their countries were involved in, all of them were assassinated or pushed out of there society because of their ideas.
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet revolves around Hamlet’s quest to avenge his father’s murder. Claudius’ first speech as King at the beginning of Scene 2, Act 1 introduces the themes of hierarchy, incest and appearance versus reality and plays the crucial role of revealing Claudius’ character as part of the exposition. The audience is left skeptical after Horatio’s questioning of King Hamlet’s ghost in the first scene of the play. By placing Claudius’ pompous speech immediately after the frightening appearance of Hamlet’s ghost, Shakespeare contrasts the mournful atmosphere in Denmark to the fanfare at the palace and makes a statement about Claudius’ hypocrisy. Through diction, doubling and figurative language, Shakespeare reveals Claudius to be a self centered, hypocritical, manipulative and commanding politician.
In book of Romans begins with the introduction of Paul, and how he is a servant of the Lord Jesus Christ. He is writing a letter to Rome, and telling them that he plans to come and visit them to have a fruitful ministry with them (1:13). Paul begins to explain the need of righteous, and how people have sinned against God while knowing the truth. They worship ideals, murdering, sexual rituals with members of their own sex, and much more, and God is letting them do it, while Paul states they deserve to die (1:32). Paul explains that we are not allowed to judge those because we are all guilty of sin. It doesn’t matter whether if you’re a Jew or Gentile, God sees you for your heart, and if you are following His commands.
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.