A Leader is like the rubber-band that holds together branches. While one is easy to break, multiple branches with rubber-band together is more difficult . And strong leadership lead their army or country forward. Strong leader process, critical thinking, understanding, willing to defend what they believe; And he or she also need to be convincing. Cicero was a strong leader, because he was an excellent public speaker, intelligent, and he was willing to defend his point of view. Cicero was a strong leader because he was an excellent public speaker. In order to be a strong leader, it's important to be able to convince people. And one of the most important way is through public speaking: He defended an amazingly diverse clientele, dealing with the issue of slaves (pro Q. Roscio comoedo in 76), inheritance (pro Caecina in 69), citizenship (pro Archia in 62), and bribery (pro Cn. Plancio in 54), as well as causes such as the Catiline Conspiracy, which he attacked in four speeches in November of 63. He also countered Caesar's command in Gaul in 56 and, of course, directed the Philippics at Marc Antony in 43.(Bunson). Strong leader need to be able convince people, and made other believe the idea he or she believe. Cicero public speaking made the public more supportive of her. Cicero was a great leader because he is …show more content…
A leader need to be able to stand with their own political point of view. They can not change their beliefs because of they are scared: He was opposed to Caesar and was exiled through a bill of Clodius in 58 BCE. He was reconciled with Caesar but supported his assassination, and delivered a series of speeches (the Philippics) to the Senate against Antony in 44 and 43 BCE. Cicero deeply oppose some political point of he disagrees, and because he oppose of Caesar idea, he have been in exile for twice.(Bunson) A strong leader, would defend and fight for what he think is
The first reason I think that Brutus would make a good leader is that he does not want to be a king or have absolute rule.
to name a few. Through friendships, that were both personal and strategic, and even disdain, Cicero’s role and his position in Roman society were neither static nor steady. The correspondence Cicero shared with some of Rome’s more prominent figures between 68 and 43 B.C serve as evidence of Rome’s political climate and the key leaders involved. Cicero’s letters are more than simple social interactions among comrades. Rather there is a strategy in whom, how and why these letters are addressed and written the way they are.
The prosecution of Catilina was a really big deal for Cicero. Cicero believed that this was the thing could potentially prove his worth. Cicero came from a poorer family, outside of Rome. He was a citizen of Italy, but not of Rome. Most of the men in the Senate came from really old and really rich families within Rome. Their family names held power and meaning, simply because of the age and wealth that accompanied them. Cicero’s family held no weight and power, because his linage stemmed from outside of Rome. Everything Cicero was was self made. He had to build up his own reputation and make himself known. He won his consulship by complete chance. No one
Cicero, was truly a man of the state. His writings also show us he was equally a man of
With Cicero victory over Catiline it showed that the equites were moving above the established nobles. This further promoted the theme that Cicero as a “new man” and will make the republic new and better. He opposed the bill proposed by S. Rullus and his noble faction dealing with agrarian reform. However, he could not stop all future proposal by the noble grouping. Cicero started to again make his own popular claims with the policy of trying to establish harmony in the Roman Republic. However, Cicero had to deal with Catiline and his intentions to slow down and work against Cicero’s process.
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
•In Cicero’s system, speeches of all kinds are classified by their purpose: to inform, to persuade, and to entertain. Explain the purposes below.
Rome is one of the greatest kingdoms that history ever knew. Rome had a lot of great leaders that lead them to many victories and defeats. Rome did not always have kings, in Julius Caesar’s time it was a republic, no one person had all the power. In Julius Caesar, the characters Caesar, Brutus and Cassius share similar qualities of leadership that make them great leaders, the leaders then have styles of leading that are effective at leading or are ineffective at leading.
Leadership can be defined as “the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization.” While the wording comes from the United States Army’s Leadership manual, the same principles applied to the men who served in the Roman army, both the Republic and the Empire. From 508 BC to 1453 the Roman’s would be a considered a “superpower” in the world with “all roads” leading to Rome as the old proverb explains. A superpower is maintained with a strong military and Rome was no exception. During her reign, Rome saw a vast number of generals and leaders that would stand out over time. Three of these leaders would be Trajan, Marius and Scipio Africanus. These three generals would have great impact on the Roman army and its establishment of their power.
To be a leader you need to be able to inspire others, get people motivated, and set an example to other people. A leader needs to do all of these because if one of these aspects fails people don’t look at the leader...
What is leadership, and how do we attain the best and most effective leaders? These are questions that are as old as civilization itself. Bass (1974) wrote that, “from its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders” (as cited in Wren, 1995, p. 50). Since the study of history in the West is commonly held to begin with Herodotus of ancient Athens, it is not surprising that we should examine the historical views of leadership through the eyes of two titans of Greek thought: Plato and Aristotle.
To be a good leader requires a lot of attention and focus as well as the ability to say what nobody wants to hear. Not only this, but the ability to speak well in front of large demanding crowds of people and to be able to hold their attention for prolonged amounts of time. "For certainly no one can deny
“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.” Abraham Lincoln proclaimed this while speaking about how people use power for both good and evil. Power puts a leader in the position to either corrupt their character or improve on it. In Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar, there are many major themes. Many characters find their normal personalities sabotaged when they have power, while the other major theme in this essay is how those who are effective orators can easily change the minds of a crowd.
The nature of an effective leader is to portray self-confidence, integrity, enthusiasm, courage, moral commitment, emotional connection, and drive, as well as having an optimistic point of view. Having the title of a leader is more than attaining a set of leadership skills; being a leader also relies on personal qualities that may be hard to see, but are very powerful-such as charisma (Daft, p.18).