Chesapeake Vs New England Colonies Essay

812 Words2 Pages

Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. There were many reasons in the development of these colonies that cause the differences. The New England Colonies purposes were different than the southern colonies. In the north most of the colonies were settled for religious freedom, whereas in the south they settled for profit. With having different motives for their societies, colonization became very different. The Chesapeake region originally were wasting all their time looking for gold, for money, and didn't come prepared for survival in the unknown, New World. The pilgrims, who were separatist came to the new world and were ready to “set up camp” as they were there in search to create a society where they could live by their faith without the fear of the monarch disapproving. When Maryland was …show more content…

They both “self-government” techniques to help produce a safer and more reformed living style. They both had issues with the Indians. However, in the North it was more of a “one and done” situation, eliminated conflict for years by destroying the tribes around them but in the south it was many years and years of conflict with little peace settlements and certain tribes and areas working together but they didn't work together to extinguish all conflict like the Northerners did. This may have been driven by the way the people lived in the areas. In the south since people weren't close together they couldn't get enough people together to develop a strong enough army to take out the Indians whereas in the north everyone was concentrated to a smaller area so there were more people to work together. This also had a huge impact on city formation. There are hardly any cities, to this day in the south, most likely dating back to how all the plantations were separated in the

Open Document