Cesar Millan And Mark Derr Summary

813 Words2 Pages

Managing the behavior of dogs consists of many different ways, and two authors talked about their own methods on how to deal with them. Mark Derr explained how he disagreed with Cesar Millan’s way of handling dogs and training them with the use of physical intimidation. Concurring with Mark Derr’s way of training dogs is considered, in my opinion, the best and harmless method, unlike Cesar Millan’s way, whose method is rather aggressive and violent. However, some of the claims of both dog experts seem to be accurate in different point of views, such as how Mark Derr stated that aggression can lead to injury and death, as well as how Cesar Millan claimed that being exhausted from all day work leads to a calm sleep. Regardless, my opinion is that some of both Cesar Millan and Mark Derr’s claims are credible, and a few are considered inappropriate.
Mark Derr claims that aggression “can lead to injury and death.” The way Cesar Millan trains his dogs for obedience is comprised with …show more content…

His way of training is considered harsh and strict: he is “overwhelming the animal with the things it fears.” Perhaps, Cesar’s way can lead his dogs to injury, or possibly the most undesired outcome: death. Mark Derr included that aggression may be the most serious effect of the behavior problems of dogs, which can cause more than one-fifth of the country’s dog population. Behavioral problems may result from the terrible manners of their owner. Overworking them during training is quite disgraceful, making them do whatever the owner wants, and only after they “have finished their daily work do they play.” Fatigue and exhaustion could be the effect of Cesar’s training procedure, which in his claim, causes the dogs to sleep “peacefully,” unlike “domestic dogs in America do.” The wild dogs would sleep without having nightmares; “their ears would twitch, their eyes would move, but there was no whimpering or whining or

Open Document