Catriona Pennell's Pioneering Study

1114 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Narrative Essay : World War 1

At the outset of her pioneering study, A Kingdom United, Catriona Pennell sets out that she seeks to shatter the myth of ‘War Enthusiasm’ in Britain and Ireland, which she does so very convincingly throughout the book. Pennell uses a plethora of sources, including national, regional, and local newspapers; recorded interviews; pamphlets; leaflets; magazines; committee minutes; memoirs; letters; photographs; police records; sermons; government records and many more. Whilst dispelling the myth of jingoism Pennell does seek to persuade the reader that there was, as the title aptly suggests, a common and general support for the war across Britain and Ireland in 1914. For Pennell, this support and the mass volunteering does not necessarily translate …show more content…

Pennell is once again quick to the point to dispel this myth. Her well worked argument shows there was no ‘rush to the colours’ in August 1914. September was in fact the month with the strongest recruitment levels. This rise in recruitment, Pennell points out, coincided with the Times article which gave a worrying account of the British Expeditionary Force’s losses and retreat, the article ended with an appeal for more men, this explains, for Pennell, the rise in recruitment. This is extremely important for Pennell as she argues ‘thus, far from signing up in an initial burst of enthusiasm, the largest single component of volunteers enlisted at exactly the moment that the war turned serious’. People were not therefore, she argues, volunteering out of enthusiasm, but out of duty. Men felt it was their duty to volunteer to defend their nation against the bloodthirsty barbaric Hun. Her argument is further supported by the fact that recruitment rates dropped after Allied success on the Marne and then rose again after the First Battle of Ypres. When the British were perceived to be doing badly in the war men wished to help their nation. Military misfortune, therefore, not jingoism or ‘War Enthusiasm’, was, Pennell argues, the most powerful stimulant for

Show More
Related

  • The Home Front Case Study

    3302 Words  | 7 Pages

    Focus Question 1: Who was involved in the voluntary roles at The Home Front? – What part did these individuals play in contribution to the war effort? – What types of working conditions did they endure?

    Read More

  • Analysis Of David Snead's An American Soldier In World War I

    1362 Words  | 3 Pages

    For training, the author shares the difficult task involved in the training and that went into preparing the American solider for battle in World War I from multiple levels including from Brownies’ perspective. The author gave clear and concise examples to strengthen his claim concerning the overwhelming task of training an inexperienced army. As the Snead explains, “Historians, journalists, and others have written numerous books

    Read More

  • ThestuAnalysis of For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought In The Civil War by James M. McPherson

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    Overall McPherson’s reasons for the soldiers motivations were clear and concise, easy to follow and understand allowing for easy interpretation of the book. McPherson also includes multiple quotes from various letters and diary entries to support his statements which gives his statements credibility. The reasons for motivation presented in the book were convincing and were supported by numerous quotes.

    Read More

  • My Brother Sam Is Dead Character Analysis

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to

    Read More

  • The Significance of the Gallipoli Campaign in Australian History

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Gallipoli campaign was a military disaster, but it is still one of the most important conflicts in which Australia was involved. On 25th April 1915 between 4:30 and 6:30 am the Gallipoli Peninsula was invaded by British, Australian and New Zealand forces. This was to start the long, hard weeks in which the troops were fighting for ground that the enemy controlled in Turkey. They were attempting to gain a supply route to Russia to aid them in repelling the German and Turkish soldiers from their country. I will be discussing the willingness of Australians to volunteer for the war effort and the love and respect they have for their Mother Country, England.

    Read More

  • Australian Enlistment to World War I

    1429 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thesis: During World War 1, the amount of Australians enlisting decreased due to the realisation that war was not as it was portrayed to the public

    Read More

  • Biography for James Dowling

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    In short, both the life of James Dowling and the message of “Be Ye men of Valor” are strong arguments in favor of Schweitzer’s assertion that people are able to derive an indescribable pleasure from service. Both Dowling and Churchill were driven by service in their life and both of them became the men they were because of their service. The sense of accomplishment one feels from serving for a cause is throughout the ages and around the world.

    Read More

  • General Gouglas Haig

    1867 Words  | 4 Pages

    "A general who wears down 180,000 of the enemy by expending 400,000 men...has something to answer for." This idea from military historian C.E.W Bean is the main line of argument from traditionalist historians. They represent General Douglas Haig, British Commander-in-Chief of the BEF from 1915 to the end of the war in 1918, in a critical, damning light: a hopelessly incompetent general with a willingness to sacrifice the men of Britain for a few metres of muddy ground. On the converse of this interpretation is a revisionist perspective of Haig as a caring ‘architect of victory’, bringing long-term achievements with his perceptive strategies. With an examination of these two seemingly polemic perspectives and primary evidence, judgement, albeit a complex and multifaceted one, can be reached on both these smaller debates and of Douglas Haig’s role in World War One: villain or vanquisher?

    Read More

  • Pat Barker's Regeneration

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Twentieth Century: Military The First World War 1914-18.” Dartford Town Archive. 13 April 2003 <http://www.dartfordarchive.org.uk/20th_century/military_ww1.shtml>.

    Read More

  • The Main Causes of World War 1

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pope Giles. The Origins of the First World War: International Baccalaureate. Victoria, Australia: IBID Press, 2002. Print.

    Read More

  • The People’s War: Were They Really All in it Together?

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are contested views when one tries to interpret the meaning and reality of what is known as the People’s War. Undeniably, the people of England made it through the Battle of Britain, or the ‘Blitz’, with an air of unrelenting morale. With that being said, the idea of the People’s War as representative of the cohesiveness of the social classes in England, and a strong front all around, is an ideology that some argue to be contestable. To show that the People’s War generates class cohesiveness, this paper will examine both sides of the argument, and determine that the People’s War did not actually unify the whole nation. Throughout the paper, memoirs and testimonies will be used to give a representation of the acceptance of the People’s War. There is a vast amount of information to support this, such as propaganda and speeches made by Prime Minister Winston Churchill. However, the goal of this paper is to determine that the People’s War did not unify everyone in Britain, and it did not hold the theme that ‘everyone was in it together’, as seen majorly through class and gender. There are a few select groups that would disagree with the idea of the People’s War, and claim that they did not fit into this niche that is presented so popularly today.

    Read More

  • Why Men Fought In The American Revolution Summary

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    The mannerisms, attitudes, and background of the American and British soldiers contrasted greatly. The values held by the individual soldiers of the two armies differed. American soldiers had a tendency to think on their own accord and often with liberty in mind (143). In contrast, the British soldiers held the values that their army held (144). American soldiers often fought with the same men from their town or village (142). The British soldiers, however, were pulled from society and isolated from it (144). During the time of the British soldiers’ isolation, they were tightly disciplined and rigorously trained (144). This too shows a contrast between the British and American soldiers. British soldiers underwent a stricter regimen of training while the training Americans had was more informal. The commanding men of the armies, the officers, were different as well. The British officers held themselves aloof from war and quite distant from their men (145). British officers were also much harsher on their men and trained them more effectively (136). The American officer sought to achieve the refinement of the British officers but often failed in achieving it. (145). The training American officers gave to their men was also not as cohesive like the

    Read More

  • Underlying Causes of World War I

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nationalism influenced people’s thoughts about war, twisting their minds to believe that their government and military was supreme and would win a war quickly. Because “most European countries, with the exception of France and Prussia, had not had any major wars within the 19th century, they stepped into the 20th century thinking that they were immune to defeat. This idea of immunity developed as countries forgot of their past wars and sufferings. The British were confident in their naval forces, the Germans in their arms and ships, and the Russians thought their land was protected by God. Citizens strongly believed that their country was the best and would do just about anything to help their country. It became a school boy’s duty to enlist in the army upon his graduation. As Erich Maria Remarque states in his book, All Quiet on the Western Front, the “young men of twenty... whom Kantorek calls the ‘Iron Youth,’” are the ones sent off to war in Germany. Their teachers drilled this message into their minds from a young age. The boys were told that it was their duty to their country to fight. Zara Steiner, British Historian, related that British teachers were told “to teach boys that success in w...

    Read More

  • How Did The Irish Rebellion Fail

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    We can see that poor organisation was overall very important in bringing about the failure of the 1916 Easter Rising amongst other factors. The failure of the Aud to land arms was also critical in bringing about the Rising’s failure however it has to be considered whether the Rising actually had a chance of defeating the might of the British Empire in the first place. There is evidence to suggest that the rebel leaders intended to die as martyrs however it is clear that this intention was not shared amongst them all and was mainly emphasised by Pearce himself. Furthermore, it can be seen that perhaps the Rising was a strategic victory in terms of the support it brought to the republican movement although the extents of this falls in to doubt when looking conscription. Such a view is furthered by historian Richard English who believes that, “the executions helped to achieve what the rebellion itself had not- an intensification of nationalist feeling... they produced sympathy for that rebel cause which they were supposed to undermine” .

    Read More

  • Why Was World War I Inevitable?

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once engaged in a war, a country’s militarism will produce fine soldiers ready to drop like dominos on the battlefield, while the nationalism works as fuel providing the naive determination to fight the war. This nave determination and soldier production is why World War One, like every other war, continued with such persistence. But what started World War One? Was it militarism that trained young men since they were kids to become soldiers, nationalism propelling a nation's pride forward, or was it neither? While both of those aspects could be potential reasons, they’re still not the main pillars of cause.

    Read More

More about Catriona Pennell's Pioneering Study

Open Document