Case Study Delaware Law

1945 Words4 Pages

Delaware law permits dividends to be declared out of (i) a company’s surplus, as defined and in accordance with Delaware law; or (ii) if there is no surplus, out of the company’s net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year (sometimes called nimble dividends). See 8 Del. C. § 170(a). Dividends may not be declared and paid out of net profits if the capital of the company, computed in accordance with Delaware law, “shall have been diminished by depreciation in the value of its property, or by losses, or otherwise to an amount less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets” until …show more content…

In order to complete the surplus test, a company must determine the value of its net assets. Delaware law does not prescribe a method for such valuation, and while there is generally a book value for a company’s net assets based on generally accepted accounting principles, the book value does not necessarily reflect the current market value of assets and liabilities. Delaware courts have recognized this conflict and have held that a board may determine their assets’ current value when determining whether the surplus test has been satisfied. See Morris v. Standard Gas & Elec. Co., 63 A. 2d 577, 578 (1949). Absent fraud or bad faith, as long as the Board demonstrates “great care to obtain data” and exercises “informed judgment”, a court will generally not interfere with such valuation. Id. Directors do not need to obtain a formal appraisal to arrive at the valuation, but must “evaluate the assets on the basis of acceptable data and by standards which they are entitled to believe reasonably reflect present values.” See Klang v. Smith’s Food & Drug Centers, Inc., 702 A. 2d 150, 152 (Del. 1997). Therefore, intangible assets (e.g., goodwill) can play a critical role in determining whether a company passes the surplus test. For example, a board could reasonably determine that a company that would otherwise fail the surplus test based on the value of its assets reflected on its balance sheet has surplus by attributing additional value to its intangible

More about Case Study Delaware Law

Open Document