Bronwyn T. Williams Home And Away Summary

911 Words2 Pages

Name: Petros Tedla
Class: FYW: Writing Seminar
In "Home and Away: The Tensions of Community, Literacy, and Identity," which appeared in the Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Bronwyn T. Williams writes to writing teachers so that they tolerate diversity, background and culture in the classroom. In order to achieve this aim, he uses 3 moves: factual evidence, quotes from experts, and logical organization.
As an introduction, Williams uses his life experience of being raised by a middle class family. He starts the article with his life as a middle class person who was surrounded by a family of intellectuals. Using anecdotes to gain credibility. His childhood, filled with arguments and influences by his family, teachers and professors and …show more content…

Surroundings of writing material made his educational journey a rather smooth one. A journey he compares to “as a person growing up on a beach would be at swimming.” (Williams, page 343). His father, son of a coal miner in a small town, sacrificed his relationship with his family to become a middle class scholar. After he went to college, his ideas were different than his family. He also mentions his surprise when he saw other families were not debating on the dining table. Although he was raised in middle class white teachers, he sympathizes with other students who experience differences between what they learned in their communities and in literacy education. He claims that literacy is more than writing and analyzing, saying “if it is shaped by culture and context, then the cultures and contexts we inhabit in our lives outside of the classroom will necessarily influence the way we approach literacy practices in school.”(Williams, page 343). Williams reminisces the experience of a student from his colleague’s class with a background that took class discussions and review in a personal way based on her experience with her family members and community. Williams mentions this to …show more content…

He extends his claim by defining more terms mentioned by Gee, such as Primary and Secondary discourse. Primary discourses are characteristics of our core identity and Secondary discourses are what we acquire throughout our lifetimes (p. 343). Rather than experience and anecdotes, Williams switches to his scholar side and starts mentioning terms defined by famous authors who have credibility. Dyson, according to Williams, noted that middle class students don’t have better parents or intelligence. They are more exposed to material that is valued by school (page 344). They are able to go to zoos, museums, bookstores and libraries. Williams strengthens his earlier point that he could’ve chosen a different career based on his background by citing an author whose work is well known. James Gee makes an appearance in Williams’ writing again with a definition to another term. “ Dominant discourses” according to Gee are “discourses with mastery of which, at a particularly place and time, brings with it the (potential) acquisition of social goods. According to Williams, his father went to college to become a middle class scholar. His father’s decisions created a dominant discourse. Williams’ surroundings were filled with sources that lead him to become a professor and earn credibility to write this article. Without him ever noticing where

Open Document