Brief Summary Of The Problem Of Evil By T. S. Lewis

685 Words2 Pages

Hell From chapter eight in the Problem of Evil, Lewis discusses how hell is a doctrine that he would rather take out of Christianity than leave in, but when rebellious souls do not decide to surrender, Lewis contends that hell is a viable solution (Lewis, p. 119, 120). In my opinion, hell is controversial to people, because to them it does not seem to be a fair punishment for the seemingly small sins humans commit. Thus, no one thinks or believes that they are going, or should go to hell. Therefore, if no one determines that they deserve, or are going to hell, no person would want to talk about the fact that there is a chance they are going to hell without surrendering to God. Yet, if heaven exists than hell must exist also, and the conversation about it is viable, not wrong. …show more content…

Is it even moral? Lewis would argue that it is, and I would have to agree. He brings up the topic of retributive justice: that people who do bad things and do not surrender, deserve to spend an eternity away from God. Lewis even goes as far as to create an example: a man who is evil, has no remorse, and is selfish (Lewis, p.122). He appeals to logic by stating that if you were a good person your whole life and someone like that man made it into heaven, living the life the way he did, would it be fair (Lewis, p.123)? Most people would say it is not fair, and that is a valid reason why there has to be a divide between people who surrendered themselves to God and those who decided against it. But then some ask where is God’s mercy then, just like Hausdorff. He commented, “Why does hell have to be forever? Why doesn’t God just convince him (Lewis’s man from the illustration) that what he has done is wrong and then forgive him (Hausdorff, The Problem of

Open Document