Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Robots in the medical field
Robots in the medical field
Robots in the medical field
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Robots in the medical field
After watching “The Brave New World of Medical Robots (Improved Version)” speech and evaluating it, I saw many things that a good speech needs as well as things that can be left out to enhance the speech. Overall I thought that the speech was very good and I probably would have given him an A. With that being said no one is perfect therefore we cannot do everything perfect I believe there are some things that he could improve on. His introduction was awesome! He grabbed my attention with the story of mechanical arms over a woman on a surgery table as the lead in to his speech. He used the story and distinctly told us the topic of his speech followed by the three main points he would discuss. This gave us a preview that the body of the speech would discuss three specific robots and their functions in medical settings. He also proved that he was credible to give us this informative speech when he told us he was in the pre-med program at school. I thought the intro was just the right amount of …show more content…
We learned something during each point in the speech. He cited the sources and addressed them correctly. He included many interesting details and information about the robots but on the flip side I think in some parts he gave us an information overload that wasn’t necessarily pertinent to the topic. He went deeper than the headline information when he used the citations in his speech. He kept my interest by using stories about robot used in different clinical settings and examples of other ways these science fiction robots were becoming a science fact. I thought that the speech was organized in a good order and you could tell he spent a sufficient amount of time preparing his speech. The language he used was appropriate and he explained any abbreviations he used before he used them. He did however lack humor in the speech but his topic didn’t really call for humor so it was acceptable for this
He took a stand to make a difference in something he was passionate about and he urged the American people to do the same. He made the audience realize that even if this law is passed there will always be times that We the American people will also have to take a stand to do what’s right. His speech is so well written it makes it seem like the only option is to vote for the law to be passed. In a way this speech inspired me to take a stand when something wrong is happening and make a difference. Living in a time period where this was a big issue would have been hard but, I think it needed to happen to show the world that just because your skin color or religion we are all American people and we all need to work together to make this place
The whole speech should be available if it is important enough to stand in the top fifty speeches in history. I feel like I could not grasp a hold of how the speaker was exactly expressing himself, making the presentation unbalanced. Macarthur said “I trust, therefore, that you will do me the justice of receiving that which I have to say as solely expressing the consideration viewpoint of a fellow American (Americanrhetoric.com).” He is not telling about an event that will change history or change the lives of anyone, he is just basically saying good-bye to Congress. The speaker made his point by ending his 52 years of military service but did not use specific
The speaker organized the presentation very well and made it easy to follow for the audience. She chose words that got the message across clearly and were not difficult to understand. Since this was targeted at a younger audience, she simplified the concepts and was very specific. The sentences of the speech were structured appropriately, and had no grammatical errors. She also included some transitions in between, especially when moving from one idea to the next which made the flow
The main points were not to clear in the introduction of his speech, and the transition to his first main point was absent and made it difficult to understand if it was part of the introduction or if he was starting the body of his speech. Although The Neuroscientist did have plenty of hand gestures insinuating that he cared about what he was talking about, the guy did not do much else in terms of body language, He stood in place making it seem as if he was uncomfortable to be presenting. The biggest problem with this presentation is that the Doctor mentions the information is supported through research, but fails to disclose, who, when, and where the research was done, which makes his use of logos less
The speech didn’t feel scripted, he was comfortable and was credible with his information. His transitions went smoothly with his speech. To support his topic, he used statistics and even expert advice. He used examples, such as personal stories and friend’s stories. The detail in his explanations were put together very well and descriptive.
This is a good recap, as the thesis of the speech is about how they designed Airbnb for people to trust. Then he finishes it off by claiming that if you understand the value of trust you can design it to fit in with the essentials of forming Airbnb, which is a great summary-value, going over all the information he just covered in the conclusion statement. His exit goes over how if you can design things for humans to trust, what's to stop you at this point? His conclusion was thorough and understanding, better than any of the information he had spoken about above. It gives an understanding of exactly what he was trying to tell his audience and used a good recap and summary to state his claims in the body.
Fiskio herself was a good speaker -- she had a strong, conversational tone and used very intelligent language. She also had great articulation, pronunciation, pitch, volume, fluency, and projection. Although she paced slightly and used some hand gestures, they added to the presentation instead of detracting from it, and she kept good eye contact the entire time. Additionally, she was very confident, and she seemed poised and knowledgeable. She also used a lot of quotes and outside support, which gave her credibility and validity. Nonetheless, the presentation itself was lacking. The ideas seemed unorganized, and there was little to no explanation of their connections and relative importance to the average person. Despite its interesting beginning and ending, the body of the speech was confusing and not extremely engrossing. Even further, Fiskio’s PowerPoint was not very well done. The layout was passable, but it really only consisted of pictures slapped haphazardly on. The PowerPoint was not visually appealing and, though the pictures were good, it just seemed like it was lazily
Overall, The speech was very well presented and had a decent balance of humor within it. There was a nice touch towards the end where he sincerely thanked people who had gotten him to where he is today. Whenever you receive an award it is always good to give credit where it is due as this can help you gain more respect from your audience. Speaking in to a group this large while on television is not something that everyone can do and I feel that Will Ferrell did a good job in demonstrating the message in which he wanted to get
Upon reviewing my speech, I can understand where I need to improve my speaking skills, as well as places where I just need to fine-tune them. I chose to talk about skiing because it is an activity that I look forward to every winter, and knowing I had a trip out west over break I knew I would be able to talk about this topic easily. Although I do think that I gave an effective speech, I think there were many things to learn from the overall content, organization, and delivery of the speech. The content of my speech was an area that I think was adequate for an informative speech.
...t orator and rhetor, his ability to integrate emotion into fact and still have facts exist as true and unbiased. As a result of the heavy factual details, his logos in this speech was excellent.
The speech lasted about three minutes and thirty seconds, was concise and informative. He used direct language to rally the people and to champion the common cause. Nye was nicely dressed, adorned in his blazer and signature bow tie, he stood still, but used his hands to make his points. He frequently looked up from his notes, and effortlessly connected with the audience, despite not delivering his speech
Overall, O’ Brien did a phenomenal job connecting with his audience. His speech had universal significance because his message was, failure and change will prevail, but you should embrace it and learn from it. This message is important cause failure and change universally affects everyone. O’Brien is giving the audience valuable advice by telling them to embrace their shortcomings and losses. Many people do not know what do when they fail. O’ Brien leads the viewers into comfort by telling them he has once failed before he was successful. O’Brien speech was very effective because of his use of humor and anecdotes, which helped convey his message with his audience.
Jobs starts his speech with humor. He said, “I never graduated from college. Truth be told, this is the closest I've ever gotten to a college graduation,” this statement instantly added an element of humor to his speech and this was well observed by the audience. The opening statements of the speech automatically lightened the mood. Steve jobs’ introduction appeals to the emotions of the audience, giving Jobs a valuable opening into the rest of his speech. In the whole speech, Jobs recites three stories from his personal life, which gave him inspiration.
Paley gave the introduction part directly with a conversation. It introduced a man named Vicente that want to be a doctor. The story showed that he had a passion for that. He studied every bone and organ in the body, how it is for and how it works.