Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The debate over airport security
Effects of 9/11 on airport security
Effects of 9/11 on airport security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The debate over airport security
Are body scanners necessary for our survival To whom it May concern I am writing this letter to inform you that I stand against this policy of positioning body scanners in airports this scanner can affect our health by stepping in and having the x-ray’s hit our body, the outcome of this is to check if we have any dangers weapons that can’t be carry on airport grounds. A second reason why I stand against body scanners is the invasion of our privacy, this scanner processes our whole body inside out giving a whole picture of our body without any clothes on. While we might think that these machines will prevent future terrorist attack, but the reality is that terrorist will change tactics to avoid airport scanners. This scanner will slow airport
One of the first new pieces of technology the TSA introduced were better screeners. A new screener known as AIT or Advance imaging technology has been created to counteract items that may have been hidden from site or...
Before 1973, anyone could walk into an airport and directly head to their flight leading to the highest number of airplane hijackings in history.Airport screening has been brought around in many popular airports after the horrific events on 9/11. The technology of these scanners are improving by the year but many seem to be against this solution for security. Having full-body scanners is crucial to have in airports to avoid any more terrorist attacks which are happening more often. These scanners are our country’s number one chance of keeping terrorism out of airports and planes. New TSA requirements included checking all bags with explosive-detection machines, doing random pat-downs and conducting one-on-one screening with hand-held metal
One of the sources used to disprove that body camera isn’t the answer includes Jamelle Bouie article, Keeping the Police honest. Mr. Bouie is the chief political correspondent at Slate who graduated from the University of Virginia with a political and social thought degree (Tumblr.com). His work consists of issues relating to national politics, public policies and racial inequality. His work has also been published in Slate online magazine, the New Yorker, the Washington Post and TIME Magazine (Tumblr.com). Slate is an online magazine that post about the news, politics, business, technology and culture (slate.com). In Jamelle article, Keeping the Police honest he talks about incidents where police officers were being recorded and took excessive
Understanding a few areas where technology can be very beneficial is beneficial. Specifically, security measures or screening methods need to be reviewed. Since 9/11 many different areas have changed in the way airports conduct business. Security is always a serious concern and needs critical thinking. Airport security is not an area to lose focus on when it comes to security processes needed. One area needing some prevention and is a concern is the insider threat.
Four means of improving technological surveillance has been proposed since 9/11. Biometrics, identification cards, closed circuit television, and communication measures have all improved drastically since the 9/11 attacks. “Each of these surveillance technologies has some bearing on the garnering of personal data” (Lyon 74). Biometrics is one of the four technological advances which came about after the attacks. Biometrics is the use of data extracted from the body, such as through digital image, and fingerprints. “Biometrics relies on having access to some physical characteristic, and then algorithms that enable the verification process to be automated” (Lyon 71). Many facilities today use fingerprint scanners as a form of biometrics. United States intelligence state boomed during 9/11. There was a drastic increase in government oversight, especially through the networks of phone and web surveillance (Green
Airport security has changed since September 11, but this change is not always a good thing. One of the major changes that has taken place in airport security is more searches are being done. As a result of increasing the number of searches taken place, more people have their privacy rights violated. Another result of the increase of airport security is that less peopl...
The duties of a police officer is very important, they protect us and enforce the law. Yet over the years, many officers have taking advantage of the privilege by brutalizing citizens and many other injustice crimes which cause many riots and protests. Body cameras should be a requirement for police officer because it’ll help reduce the use of force by police officer, reduce dishonesty in reports, and condemn both police and citizens to behave.
Did you know by late 2011, Europe had banned full-body scanners from its airports? Why has America not followed in Europe's lead? Many Americans have different opinions on the scanners being used. The advances in technology enable America to use full-body scanners to detect objects on a person's body for security screening purposes, without removing clothes or making physical contact. The United States have been using full-body scanners to update their airport security against attacks. Are body scanners worth the protection and making people feel better when it is a violation of rights and the money could be used in other places better.
A young black man is killed by a police officer while the officer is on duty. The officer claims that the man attacked him and was simply defending himself. Those supporting the boy say the police officer was harsher with him because of racism. Some would trust the word of the officer as he is in authority and others the boy because of previous racism shown in the area. But what is there to show what really happened during the encounter? Body cameras. With them, the amount of violent encounters, such as the one example shown, can be reduced and the public will not argue against the police as there is evidence of what really happened.
Security Surveillance Cameras are a major concern in the modern world for every person. They play a major role as it records everything and it keeps proof of what is going around. Civilians are extremely worried about how security surveillance has gone out of control and they feel threatened. Wendy Kaminer’s article, “Trading Liberty for Illusions” was first published in Free Inquiry in the year 2002, claims that when Americans feel threatened, they tend to give up their freedoms for faux security measures. On the other hand, The Economist which is a weekly magazine published
Police officers should always be equipped with body cameras. Body cameras on police officers should be enforced because it will lead investigators to the truth, civilian complaints will fall dramatically, and there would be less violence.
Today, many questions are raised about police brutality. Numerous incidents have occurred that follow the same pattern: a police officer shoots a man and it is unclear whether the shot was justified. Body cameras are the answer. Body cameras can record police and civilian interaction, thereby providing clear evidence. Body cameras will take away the uncertainty in cases. Body cameras should be implemented because they benefit both the officers and the public.
Distracted driving is an issue we hear about constantly. Don't text and drive. Stop checking Facebook behind the wheel. Don't touch the radio behind the wheel. We are bombarded by these campaigns everywhere. But what about pedestrians? What about those people who walk down the street with their head down, staring at the words their thumbs are creating on a touch screen? We always hear about the classic trope in which one was on their phone, or distracted while driving and ends up driving into a mailbox, but what about the not-so-clichés such as crossing at a red because you were too busy asking your partner what was for dinner, or you were too busy asking your friend what the plan was to realise that you've walked off a bridge? These are both true stories unearthed by the research team at the University of Ohio, to show the true dangers behind distracted pedestrians (Nasar, 2013).
Long lines, delays, luggage, metal detectors, people of every culture -- these are all features regularly found at airports around the world, and now a new technology that has the ability to detect objects beneath a passenger’s clothing could become another one of these commonly seen items. These innovative machines were designed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and are called advanced imaging technology or AIT machines. This new type of security method, although steps ahead of previous airport security procedures, has drawn criticism due to concerns with privacy. Eight years ago, the AIT machines that are currently causing opposition were just beginning to be tested by officials at Orlando International Airport (Rosen par. 1). After being tested, the machines began deployment to larger airports across the country in 2007 (“Advanced” par. 1). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides the main funding for the new technology. The funds from the ARRA are enough to manufactur nearly one thousand full-body scanners (“Advanced” par. 3; Walsh par. 10). Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary, explains that “each and every one of the security measures we implement serves an important goal: providing safe and efficient air travel for the millions of people who rely on our aviation system every day” (qtd. in Sorentrue par. 5). No matter where a plane is departing from or where it is scheduled to fly, the safety of passengers must be the TSA’s number one priority. As security threats become more advanced, so must the screening measures in order prevent them. The TSA should increase the production and use of advanced imaging technology machines in airports across the country.
“O’Hare Airport Debuts Full-Body Scanner in Chicago.” UPI Photo Collection. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 17. January. 2014.