Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of making choices essay
The importance of freedom of choice
The importance of personal choice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of making choices essay
We as human beings all have choices. Many of the choices we make can affect us for the rest of our lives. Among the more important decisions a person will ever have to face is that of betrayal. Often times we are in a situation in which we must chose sides: “Whom to betray?”, and in this case, the options are friend or country. I agree with E. M. Forster’s view on personal relations and patriotism, believing that “I hope I should have the guts to betray my country” (Forster) over my friend. A person should always – and one might even say has a duty to – place his conscience or the moral laws he has set for himself over any conflicting manmade law. Many examples throughout history have set precedents for this sort of behavior. Antigone’s burial of her brother Polyneices, when Tim DeChistopher outbid many corporations in a land drilling auction to protest global warming, Martin Luther King’s civil disobedience to end segregation, and the Weather Underground’s violent acts of terror to “bring the war home” were all courageous acts (justified or not) of disloyalty to the federal g...
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is a prime example of this act of disobedience, and said, “The end justifies the means, even though the means are regrettable.” He however did not question the legitimacy of the American government but rather the particular laws that he and others felt were unjust. The civil rights movement was started by Dr. King, in which he found that it would be against
There are times throughout the history of the United States when its citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government. Two such cases occurred during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau. Both men courageously confronted the mighty us government; both spent time in jail as a result of their defiant actions; both men stood for a belief in a better future, and both presented their dreams through non-violent protest and civil disobedience. The similarities in their course of action are undeniable, but each man used different terms on which they based their arguments. Martin Luther King Junior's appeal through the human conscience, and Henry Thoreau's excellent use of patriotism, present similar issues in very dissimilar ways.
Phillips, L. (2014, February 16). The Drudgery of Treason. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://theintermediateperiod.wordpress.com/2014/02/16/
Simon Keller argues in his essay "Patriotism as Bad Faith" that patriotism is not a virtue but it is actually a vice. Keller begins by splitting the views on this philosophical debate into three different representations. The first being the "communitarian patriot", where patriotism is not only a valued virtue to someone's self but that it is actually an essential virtue. The second representation is a radical contradiction of the first, known as the "hard universalist. The hard Universalist sees patriotism as a vice instead of being any type of positive virtue. They think that everyone should be valued the same, and that there should be no favoritism. The third representation is the idea of the first two combined, to form what is called the "soft universalist." This view is understood as patriotism is allowed, and is not seen as a vice, but also that one has an obligation to the rest of the world, almost to try and treat them as a loyalty that you would have towards your own country. (p.112).
Imagine not wanting to do something, yet complying to what society demands. People are constantly put in these situations with life altering decisions. The concepts of loyalty and pride can ultimately skew one’s decisions in these moments. Whereas, Tim O’Brien is faced with participating in the Vietnam war or escaping to Canada. One decision could kill him and the other leaving him a runner of the draft and incapable of return. In the end, Tim O’Brien chose what could possibly kill him, the war.
A traitor is defined as a "person who betrays his or her country, cause, friends, etc. " (Webster)
In times of war, such as these, the importance for everyone to know where they stand on the idea of patriotism so they can voice or enact their opinion to the government and the people around them in a more clear and fair fashion is multiplied. The idea of patriotism can often be an obscure one, and during times of heightened security patriotism is a more spoken upon subject. Discussing the many different views of what patriotism means is a key step in better defining patriotism for all people. Barbara Kingsolver says in her article, “My patriotic duty is to recapture my flag from the men now waving it in the name of jingoism and censorship” (Pg. 2). What she means by this is that the idea of patriotism is being morphed into something it is not. She believes patriotism should encourage free speech and criticism of our leaders in times of difficult decisions. Instead, what is happening is patriotism is suggesting more fascist ideals than democratic ideals. Barbara believes her duty is to recapture the true meaning of patriotism and let everyone know what that meaning is. She wants everyone to feel open towards voicing t...
Thesis: Betrayal is a form of deception and disloyalty that breaks people’s trust, creates conflicts, jeopardizes relationships, impacts people in a negative manner and leads people to their demise.
It is important to realize that the human voice should be heard whether it is from anger to an appeal of emotions. Looking upon “On Duty Of Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and a “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. we observe how sooner or later humankind will speak up. Although many human beings in society won’t even speak up due to the fact of being intimidated of judgement or of those who lead.
While the law is meant to be universal, reformers, activists, and civil rights leaders all testify to its inconsistencies in the long and unending trial of history. Recognizing the distance between the law and morality and attempting to reconcile them requires both a realistic assessment of the current situation and a naïve optimism that, with the sheer force of democracy, it can and will improve. This explains why the most powerful and ironic motivation for civil disobedience is patriotism. Democracy opposes both tyranny and anarchy, and needs civil disobedience to sustain such a contradiction. The difference in personal and legal interpretation of the law is not the same as the difference between the subjective and the objective; instead,
Loyalty allows people to make sacrifices in order to protect the ones that are deat to them. In the book The Chrysalids written by John Wyndham, there are individuals willing to die for one another just to keep each other safe from the society trying to hunt them down.
Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.
The greatest transformations in American history have come from fearless citizens rebelling against unjust treatment. However, some of America’s greatest downfalls can also be a result of rebellion. When John Carlos and Tommie Smith stood on the podium at the 1968 summer games in Mexico City, they had the intent of raising a black gloved fist in the air during the National Anthem to bring awareness of continuing inequality between races. The men wanted to show U.S. pride by doing so, but instead displayed what many interpreted as a dishonor, ultimately making their rebellion ineffective.
Ultimately, these individuals galvanized to confront these “folk-devils” and denounce their immorality that was believed to threaten the stability of U.S. society. Those opposing the perceived threat of “superpredators” wanted to send a clear message: behavior contradicting those established by the community would not be tolerated and measures would be taken redraw the lines of morality consistent with accepted behaviors within U.S. society. The people that benefited from the
Introduction: This paper deals with the paradoxical relationship between national and patriotic values and the very laws of humanity that crop up in some particular contexts/situations such as the one exemplified in the character of Dr. Sadao Hoki in Pearl s Buck’s “The Enemy”.