On Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

1081 Words3 Pages

It is important to realize that the human voice should be heard whether it is from anger to an appeal of emotions. Looking upon “On Duty Of Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and a “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. we observe how sooner or later humankind will speak up. Although many human beings in society won’t even speak up due to the fact of being intimidated of judgement or of those who lead. Henry David Thoreau author of “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” (1849) was known to be a transcendentalist. Although Thoreau’s main focus was supposed to be against slavery in the United States and the Mexican-American war. His way of thinking did not necessarily appeal to the government. Therefore, leading to him having a rant particularly trying to reach out to the Americans informing them to rebel if troubled by the government. Thoreau himself was imprisoned for not paying taxes, his way of being free. Michael King Jr. is also known as Martin Luther King Jr. …show more content…

To begin with, “If you are cheated...you do not rest satisfied...you take effectual steps at once to obtain [the] full amount, and see that you are never cheated again...perception and the performance of right, changes things and relations: it is essentially revolutionary.” (Thoreau 5). With this in mind, we view how Thoreau is comparing unjust law as being cheated upon therefore the people should handle the action. Generally speaking, an unjust law is not remarkably fair nor does give off a pleasant sensation. However, many citizens perform absolutely nothing when being confronted by an unjust law in spite of existing in the moment. In other words, Thoreau is expressing to the people that they should stand up for themselves if not consider being scammed upon. Under the circumstance of being scammed many individuals would not allow dishonesty to occur on their

Open Document