Banning Books In Schools

750 Words2 Pages

The Scarlet Letter, The Diary of Anne Frank, and To Kill a Mockingbird all have something in common; these books, although great literary classics, have been banned in schools throughout various points in history. These and other classics are vital for young adolescents to be exposed to since they instill important values and introduce wholly different eras with dated and unconventional ideas. Unfortunately, the government has decided that such improper books should be forbidden from schools due to parental concern for their children’s school reading. Even though this government interference protects what students read, such as the unconcealed use of profanity, racial slurs, and sexual references, books should not be banned in schools because this act goes against the First Amendment and hinders students’ ability to learn and develop as human beings. When debating whether banning books is of serious …show more content…

The child is able to develop his/her their own opinion of the book and, from there, aspire to become the best at anything they wish to accomplish. It is because of these books, students will become educated and expand their thought process allowing them to excel in school. Clearly, banning these books in school does not only hinder the child’s ability to learn, but also their ability to see what is actually happening in the world around them. History class itself does not meet the requirements these students need in order to fully grasp what was happening in that era. With the help of these books, students are able understand other eras and recognize the transition of time and ideas. These books do not provoke the child to think a certain way, but, instead, lets the child experience the novel the way they choose to. Instead of banning books, parents should know what their child is exposed to at their schools library or classroom

Open Document