Banned Drones Research Paper

339 Words1 Page

Bang. Have you ever thought about using a non-piloted drone to hunt? More hunters are using drones to hunt than ever. Should they use the drones? Drones should be used for hunting, it helps people hunt for food and people can use drones to scout ahead and see if there is anything hostile in that area.
First people who hunt for food can use drones to help supply their families with food. In Michael R. Shea’s article he states that 20 states have banned the use of non- piloted drones. If one of the these states is alaska then that could hurt the people that have to hunt for food, because they may use drones to see if there are predators or if there is enough game to make it worth it. If they banned drones that then would cause families to starve until they go on another hunting trip. Also if the hunters couldn't use drones to see if there was dangerous terrain then they may get trapped and die in the icy, cold, woods of Alaska. Overall if they banned drones it would hurt families that hunt for food. …show more content…

Ro Bailey is a retired air force general states that, “My team has flown 39 unmanned, overhead flights, with either a small rotter or fixed-wing plane.” “Every bit of our video shows that big animals don’t even know that we're there.” During these test they have seen foxes, moose, and a polar bear with her cubs. Hunters would of had to face these predators if they didn’t have drones. Overall if drones were banned hunters will have to face more life-threatening obstacles. Overall if drones were banned from hunting this could endanger the life of countless hunters. This would also endanger the life of the hunter’s families who would starve. Finally if drones were banned from hunting this would cause a dramatic increase of hunters who die every

More about Banned Drones Research Paper

Open Document