Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on metacognitive strategy
Metacognition thinking about learning
Reflection on metacognitive strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on metacognitive strategy
As noted by the article, “Cognitive psychologists use the term metacognition to describe our ability to assess our own skills, knowledge, or learning. That ability affects how well and how long students study— which, of course, affects how much and how deeply they learn” (Lang, 2012). Students who thrive academically regularly rely on being able to think effectively and independently in an effort to take control of their learning. A student who is motivated about education and navigating toward academic achievement may well be destined to become an independent thinker on the way to mapping out a sensible path for school, career, and life. Being metacognitive can be equated to being more sensible, insightful, and conscious of one's growth along the path of learning. Metacognition at all ages is important because it is a process that should continue to progress as students grow and develop. It is essential for all students in order to monitor their own learning which is ultimately needed for academic success. Having and utilizing metacognitive skills at all ages can help students create goals for themselves, attempt to …show more content…
Digital literacy allows students to access, analyze, and produce academic products that are essential to the learning process; therefore, I believe that technology in the digital age helps to develop metacognition and enhance metacognitive skills. Metacognition is thus effective when integrated with technology. For example, students can use graphic design programs to digitally construct diagrams and graphic organizers. They can converse on social media sites or in collaborative documents while doing their assignments to communicate ideas and concepts. The use of technology for academic reasons requires effective implementation of metacognitive skills such as planning, monitoring, and critical problem solving which is needed for student
Just spending some time in the modern-day classroom; I have observed several students on their phones. During my high school years we did not have to worry about cell phones or laptops being a constant problem. In Annie Murphy Paul’s “You’ll Never Learn!” she explains the studies of multitasking while students do their homework with the modern-day distraction of the digital age; resulting in a lower quality of learning. I agree with Paul that the digital age is becoming a problem in education, even though educators are leaning towards teaching on a digital spectrum. In this essay, I will explain how a digital age versus a non-digital age is effecting everyone involved in a higher education.
Metacognition can be complex; however, it is essential to teach at an elementary level because it’s an intellectual habit that can be obtain by the teacher’s method of teaching and the student’s consciousness of learning. Thinking about thinking is necessary in elementary level because of the awareness of the student’s thinking process. The teacher must be conscious of the different aspects of learning of each student and be able to work with them with different strategies that are the best to make their learning process more effective and interesting.
In this article, he offers a well-illustrated analysis that encourages readers to regulate the use of technology in the classroom. He believes that technology can get in the way of building a strong foundation of basic skills and insists that computers should aid the learning process, not replace cognitive thinking. Gelernter admits that computers are helpful for educational purposes if used wisely. He suggests, “Computers have the potential to accomplish great things. With the right software, they could help make science tangible or teach neglected topics like art and music” (278).
Unlike other areas of psychology (Baron, 2000; Sternberg, 2003; Watson & Glaser, 1980; West et al., 2008; Yanchar et al., 2008), critical thinking is emerging as a disciplinary practice in educational psychology. By all means, taking into consideration the long history and debate surrounding the meaning of critical thinking (Thayer-Bacon, 2000; Yanchar et al., 2008), I realize that no definition or paradigm is likely to be universally accepted or that it could capture the nuance that surrounds its complexity. As a separate disciplinary practice in educational psychology, critical thinking may include a number of key characteristics that I outlined previously. Indeed, from the approach that I have taken, there is evidence at present to confirm the complexity of critical thinking (e.g., Kember et al., 2000; Leung & Kember, 2003; Phan, 2007, 2009), and how this high order level of reflective thinking affects students' academic learning and development. The positive interrelatedness with other motivational variables also validates the potent role of critical thinking in the learning process. One critical facet of critical thinking that may be advanced further includes its intricate association to the strategies of self-regulation. Extrapolating the theoretical contentions and empirical evidence from these two lines of research
Metacognition is a cognitive theory, defined as a leaner’s awareness of his or her own learning process. Grounded in constructivist theory, metacognition gained widespread prominence in the 1970s. Metacognition, or “thinking about thinking”, is not a clearly defined word. research on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning must be firmly connected with theory. As Winters et al. (2008) note, the lack of clear guiding conceptual frameworks in research studies creates confusion in terminology and leads researchers to use terms interchangeably. Thus, rather than asking how metacognition is involved during self-regulation, we end up asking whether metacognition is the same as self-regulation. Such definitional quandaries thwart
Critical thinking is recognized by accrediting bodies as an outcome for graduates of bachelor and master’s level programs, but no consensus exits on its definition and measurements (Ali, Bantz, & Siktberg, 2005, p. 90). Some critical thinking “descriptors are: confidence, contextual perspective, flexibility, inquisitiveness, intellectual integrity, intuition, open-mindedness, perseverance, and reflection. In addition, individuals who think critically have the ability to use the cognitive skills of analyzing, applying standards, discriminating, seeking information, reasoning logically, and transforming knowledge (Scheffer & Rubenfeld, 2000) (Ali, Bantz, & Siktberg, 2005, p. 90).
Howard Gardner is the “John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and Adjunct Professor of Neurology at the Boston University School of Medicine, and Senior Director of Harvard Project Zero” (Gardner bio, Multiple Intelligences and Education, MI Theory, and Project Zero). As director of Project Zero, it provided and environment that Gardner could begin the exploration of human cognition (Multiple Intelligences and Education). Project Zero colleagues have been designing assessment and the use of multiple intelligences (MI) to realize more personalized curriculum, instruction, and teaching methods; and the quality of crossing traditional boundaries between academic disciplines or schools of thought in education (Gardner bio). MI theories offer tools to educators that will allow more people to master learning in an effective way and to help people “achieve their potential at the workplace, in occupations, and in the service of the wider world” (Gardner papers).
The researcher will adopt the survey on Jr. Metacognitive Awareness Inventory which originally proposed by Sperling, Howard, Miller, and Murphy. It consists of 18 statements to which participants respond by marking a Likert scale with numbers from 1 (“never”) to 5 (“always”). Average completion time is approximately twenty minutes. The Jr. MAI statements represent two component categories of metacognition, metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Within the knowledge component are statements of declarative knowledge (knowledge about self and strategies), procedural knowledge (knowledge about strategy use), and conditional knowledge (when and why to use strategies). The regulation component covered planning (goal setting), information
Students use self-assessments to monitor their progress towards reaching a defined goal. Observing, interpreting, judging and planning are some of the components of self-assessments that contribute to the development of autonomy (“Framework for Self,” 2006). These components enable students to identify their specific learning style and develop strategies to improve performance. An autonomous learner takes greater responsibility for his or her educational outcomes. The first step to becoming an autonomous learner is through self-assessment.
In less than a decade, computer use progressed from programming classes for a few of the better students, to literacy classes for all students, to the integration of computers and technology into the curriculum. Now, there is a goal for educators to use technology as a tool in efforts to teach more effectively by using a variety of strategies to meet different needs in a diverse classroom. This will take training and commitment to keep up in an area that changes quickly, but the benefits to teachers and students are greater that the effort it will take to stay informed; computers increase productivity of students and make learning a fun experience. They help students become better problem-solvers instead of just rote learners.
Is thinking for one’s self worth potentially having the wrong answer? Would it be worth it for students to go through school without having to think for themselves. In the articles Learning by Heart by Susan Tanner and Diagnosing and Treating the Ophelia Syndrome by Thomas Plummer it examples how children were taught from a young age to answer questions routinely, the way the teacher prefers. The issue with this is that the student never develops the ability to think for themselves. The articles discuss the different advantages and disadvantages for developing this skill. They provide steps and resources for one to reach independent thinking. The articles explain the positive and negative advantages of memorization and reciting past writings. These articles share that individual thinking and memorization will help students learn more efficiently.
Throughout history we have many advancements. Technology has been one of the biggest. The top five advancements that have changed the face of education are Social Media, Online Classrooms, Tablets, Smartphones, and Free Online Resources. We can almost guarantee that in the future another advancement will be released that can help further our education or our children's education. This paper is going to introduce and further explore how digital learning will change education in the future. Listed below will be a few key subjects that will be discussed and further researched in the paper.
Digital learning is defined as learning through digital devices such as computers, tablets, or smart phones over the Internet. It is also known by other names, such as virtual learning, online learning, e-learning, distance learning, or continuing education. Digital learning was first introduced as “Computer Assisted Learning Center” in 1982 [1]. The first online course was introduced by “Computer Assisted Learning Campus” in 1994, in which students can take courses over the web [1]. Michael Chasen and Matthew Pittinsky founded Blackboard in 1997. In 1999, Blackboard, SmartThinking and e-campus became popular among different universities around the world. Between 2002 and 2008, there was an increase in students taking online courses by 187% [2]. In the year 2009, total number of students who were taking web-based curriculum was 5.5 million [2]. This statistic shows that the online learning trend is on the rise each day.
Technology properly used in the classroom has many advantages to a student’s learning. Technology can help students become more involved in their own learning process, which is not seen in the traditional classroom. It allows them to master basic skills at their own rate rather than being left behind. Teachers and students alike can connect to real life situations by using technology in the classroom; this can also help to prepare students for real world situations. Technology can be used to motivate students as well as to offer more challenging opportunities. It can also be used as a visualization tool to keep students interested in the subject that is being taught. When technology is used effectively, students have the opportunity to develop skills that they may not get without the use of technology (Cleaver, 2011). Assessing and monitoring students is easier on the teacher because of the ability to use technology in the classroom. When technology is used correctly it offers limitless resources to a classroom atmosphere.
Vision Statement: My vision is to ensure that every student gains the acceptable knowledge to understand and learn the concepts of what education has to offer. Within this context I perceive integrating technology as a tool that will expand learning abilities. Therefore, my vision is to provide instructional technology skills into the curriculum. As a follower of the 21st Century Framework I will set into the standards of education the 21st Century themes, the mastery of core subjects, learning and innovation skills, information media and technology skills along with life and career skills to ensure that every student masters these skills. Stimulating an academic environment that is dedicated to support and enhance student’s commitment to today’s digital world will promote success.