Asoka Dbq Analysis

617 Words2 Pages

Society selectively chooses one’s legacy. No one chooses to remember Hitler for his efforts to preserve wildlife. Everyone remembers him for WWII and The Holocaust. But Asoka’s legacy, leader of the Mauryan Empire (located in modern India) from 268-232 BCE, is not so obvious. He was the founding father of India and brilliantly built the Mauryan Empire into a world power. But he also had a dark side, causing debate about his legacy. Asoka was an enlightened ruler because he added Kalinga to India, made many reforms, and promoted welfare.
Kalinga was awkwardly located in the middle of India, which made it arduous to travel from one side to the other (Doc A). And by wisely adding Kalinga, Asoka made traveling throughout the Indian empire much …show more content…

For example, one of his edicts: “Medicinal herbs… have been brought and planted wherever they did not grow” (Doc D). This drastically improved the general health and saved thousands of lives. For example, a woman needs Herb X within two days, or she will die. But Herb X only grows 2,000 miles away; it cannot be transported by a horse within two days, and she dies. Her disease, however, is also communicable. Now everyone has it in her village and they could all die. But with Asoka’s reform, this hypothetical woman would not have died, and her disease would have been treated before it could spread, preventing thousands of deaths. Another one of Asoka’s reforms can be found on Pillar Edict IV: “…prisoners who have been convicted and sentenced to death shall be granted a respite of three days when their relatives may appeal to the officials for the prisoners’ lives” (Doc D). This gave prisoners a second chance; if sentenced to death, they could live. Asoka allowed for them to have second chances because he realized that life is beautiful and understood that the most valuable thing in life— is life. He made it his duty to protect and save lives. And he …show more content…

But there was no other way to obtain land in the ancient world. The only way was through conquest; and inevitably, deaths occur in conquest. No one argues that Alex the Great was ruthless—he even has “great” in his name. But unlike Alexander the Great and many others, Asoka promoted welfare for the less fortunate: “…gave rich gifts to the poor…consulted with local communities about proper governance, about good conduct,” (Doc C). Asoka had compassion for others. If he were ruthless, he would be in his palace, living a lavish life. But he did

More about Asoka Dbq Analysis

Open Document