Arguments Against Residential Adoption

777 Words2 Pages

Denied because of their race differences, many children suffer trying to find a loving family and home. Some facilities deny a family from completing the adoption process because they believe the family is unable to provide for the child’s needs. Social workers have swamped families with stories to scare them out of interracial adoption. Children in foster care are allowed to be in any home, so adoption should not be any different. Despite the thoughts of social workers, children in transracial adoptions can find a racial identity, and a family does not need to have the same customs, or skills to have a loving successful family.

The movement started with the InterEthnic Adoption Amendment, passed in 1996, to get rid of difficulties in completing the adoption process …show more content…

Mary Lou Dymski and David Boyce live in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and have two adopted kids with Haitian heritage. At their home, they have a motto “L’Union Fait La Force” meaning “Through unity we find strength”, to remind the kids where they came from. Her children, nine and six at the time, had an open adoption, which means they have visitation privileges with their biological mother. Dymski and her husband do worry about their kids. Even though the family lives in a diverse neighborhood, the curiosity of classmates still prevails. The family is polite and tells them it's private, or they do not want to talk about it. Since the adoption took place after a few years of life, their mother worries they didn't get all the education they could have gotten. (Nissman). Dymski says, “No matter how you become a parent, there is a time when you’re not, then you are, whether you give birth or you adopt. Our family is a family and we deal with the same issues biological parents deal with” (Nissman). This quote shows that the bond between guardians and children occurs no matter how the family comes

More about Arguments Against Residential Adoption

Open Document