Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
125 word essay on history of national parks
National parks history paper
National parks history paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 125 word essay on history of national parks
America's national parks are under attack. One of the most famous defenders of national parks was President Teddy Roosevelt. “While president, Roosevelt personally surveyed the country for potential parks and refuges, exploring natural areas new to him” (“Roosevelt”). Another early environmentalist was John Muir, who led Roosevelt to some of the more spectacular national park sites, like Yellowstone (“Roosevelt”). Both men wanted nature to be protected from businessmen who wanted to develop the land instead of appreciate it. “These temple destroyers, devotees of ravaging commercialism, seem to have a perfect contempt for Nature, and, instead of lifting their eyes to the God of the mountains, lift them to the Almighty Dollar” (Muir …show more content…
“The House repeatedly has approved drilling in the refuge as part of broad energy legislation” (Taylor). “A bipartisan group of House members is trying to rally support for an end to the ban, which has blocked access to potential oil fields off California, Florida and other states” (Woo and Hughes A2). One of the more vocal political advocates for more drilling is Representative Gosar, and “[his] elevation to subcommittee chairman, coupled with President Donald Trump's vow to push for more energy development on land controlled by the federal government, is cause for concern among environmentalists” (Fears). The opposition is not just from politicians. While many citizens want the regulations that protect the scenery, animals, and history, other citizens want to explore some deregulation. “Carlos Vasquez said he had previously opposed offshore drilling because of environmental concerns. But the 41-year-old lawyer said the recent rise in gas prices changed his mind” (Woo and Hughes A2). However, Americans should protect national parks for the wildlife, for the people and for the environment. “Landscape gardens, places of recreation and worship, are never made beautiful by destroying and burying them” (Muir 184). In fact, Geltman admitted that the potential for damage could increase with more drilling. “Directional drilling does not …show more content…
"Coalition to Protect America's National Parks CPANP, Washington, D.C.; HelpSaveNationalParks.Org Holiday Gift Center Launches to Support the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks." Science Letter, Dec 08, 2017, pp. 708, ProQuest. Fears, Darryl. "Arizona Congressman Wants More Drilling in National Parks." Washington Post, 1 Feb. 2017. Global Issues in Context. Geltman, Elizabeth Ann Glass. “Oil and Gas Drilling in National Parks. National Resources Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, 2016, p145 – 192. Academic One File. “In Utah, Possible Drilling Near National Parks Triggers Controversy.” Federal Information and News Dispatch, Washington, 2009, ProQuest. Muir, John. Yosemite, The Floating Press, 2012. ProQuest Ebook Central. “National Parks: Udall - Report Underscores Why We Must Protect Colorado's National Parks, Overcome Reckless Partisanship.” Federal Information and News Dispatch,
Also, drilling in Alaska will not harm the wildlife. Take Prudhoe Bay for example. The Central Arctic Caribou Herd that occupies Prudhoe Bay has grown from a population of 6000 in 1978 to 27000 today. This is a 450% growth over 26 years at an average of 17.3% growth per year. (Arctic Power) That’s quite an increase.
The environment needs protecting because even before the drilling started hunting was rapidly decreasing the amount of animals in the area. So if drilling occured in Alaska the animal count would go down even more. Drilling is gonna need space, and because Alaska is a mountained and woodland area they will have to make space by destroying trees etc. Destroying trees means destroying animals’ homes. According to document E ‘just look 60 miles west to Prudhoe bay- an oil complex that has turned 1,000 square miles of fragile tundra into a sprawling industrial zone containing, 1,500 miles of roads and pipes’. Also the document states that the would be
While describing his trip to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, President Carter paints and appealing picture in the minds of Americans. He mentions a “brilliant mosaic of wildflowers, mosses and lichens that hugged the tundra” (paragraph 2). As these words roll off this tongue, a beautiful landscape rolls into the minds of Americans. Furthermore, President Carter details “As the never-setting sun circled above the horizon, we watched muskox … lumber along braided rivers that meander toward the Beaufort Sea.” (paragraph 2) After hearing this description, an elegant sunset and with innocent animals roaming about pops into mind. Picturing the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in this alluring manner will greatly decrease the desire to harm it. By utilizing imagery, President Carter convinces Americans of the beauty of the reserve and therefore the need to preserve
Committee on Senate Energy and National Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. 3 June 2003: ESBCO. Mission Viejo Library., Mission Viejo, CA. 31 July 2005. http://web31.epnet.com/citation.
Robbins, Jim. Last Refuge: The Environmental Showdown in Yellowstone and the American West. New York: Morrow, 1993. Print.
Yochim, Michael. “The Development of Snowmobile Policy in Yellowstone National Park.” N.P. Web. 4 March 2014.
There are more than twenty-thousand employees that work in a wide reaching variety of organizations and disciplines. The employees work from the parks, to covering specific regions, to working in national programs throughout the National Park Service. At the top of the National Park Service is a Director who is supported by senior executives who manage national programs, policy, and budget in the Washington, DC, headquarters, and seven regional directors responsible for national park management and program implementation. In addition to the employees there are park partners and volunteers who work in a boots on the ground type of role in the
Despite protecting millions of acres of wilderness, this act provided for the numerous groups of people affected by the establishment of this law. Stipulations regarding the use of protected lands by private landowners were made. People living inside the park lands were guaranteed the right to subsistence hunting and fishing, as well as the guaranteed access to their lands. This right of access is the main concern for this argument, as it is a major management issue for park officials and land owners alike.
..."Alaska Oil Spill Fuels Concerns Over Arctic Wildlife, Future Drilling." National Geographic News. 20 Mar. 2006. Web. 3 July 2010.
Schltz Jr, Thomas M. Wofl reintoduction into Yellowstone Nation Park: a symbol of changing values and hiden agendas? 1995.
Since its creation in 1916, the National Park Service (NPS) has had to balance between its two goals, which are to preserve wilderness and nature and to provide the public with access to these wonders in a monitored environment. These two goals tend to create a conflict for the NPS because as soon as one goal is given more priority than the other, the administration of national parks is harshly criticized by the public. The accusation that by allowing people to experience the wilderness, the NPS is corrupting the natural environment is very common, as well, as the criticism towards the lack of government funding to preserve nature and history. However, regardless of arguable criticism and a certain need for improvement, after one hundred years,
The environmental danger taken by offshore drilling is very straight forward, made clear by oil spills such as the recent BP oil spill and the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 off the shore of Alaska. In the circumstances of the Exxon Valdez spill up to 250,000 sea birds died, over 2,800 sea otters and thousands of other animals], (figures from the BP oil spill are not yet concluded), having had a heavy strike on the regional wildlife and directing to a ban on all offshore drilling in America, until George Bush overturned it in 2008 to this repeal was a misjudgment because two years later there was the Deepwater Horizon spill. In this way, offshore drilling ruins ecosystems and fish supplies which creates a wasteland of a shoreline among southern USA.
National Park Services, U.S. Department of Interior. Nps.gov, 27 Dec. 2004. Web. The Web. The Web.
By placing this emphasis on beauty in the wilderness the American people expected to see a beautiful wilderness, although in reality these two are not mutually exclusive. Muir supported a form of natural improvement in which alterations to the natural world are made, but not with any economic value in mind. Interestingly, Muir suggests that our wildness is a commodity to which, we are glad to see how much of even the most destructible kind is still unspoiled”. (Muir) By the time the National Park Service was founded in 1916 the American people wanted to be entertained by, and in, nature
“… It is apparent, then, that we cannot decide the question of development versus preservation by a simple referral to holy writ or an attempt to guess the intention of the founding fathers; we must make up our own minds and decide for ourselves what the national parks should be and what purpose they should serve.”-Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire