Argumentative Essay: The Right To Bear Arms

859 Words2 Pages

The Right to Bear Arms The United States holds five percent of the world’s population, yet thirty-one percent of the world’s public mass shootings (Christensen). Yes, legislation for stricter gun laws is discussed after each devastating shooting; however, the Second Amendment prevents any effective legislation from being passed. Eventually, the talk of new laws diminishes, leaving the number of mass shootings in America tremendously high. Because of the right to bear arms, gun laws remain loose, and American citizens continue to be murdered; therefore, Congress needs to amend the Second Amendment to restrict the right to bear arms and enable stricter gun laws to be passed. Other countries have stricter gun laws and, as a result, less mass shootings. Australia has …show more content…

Ever since the Sandy Hook shootings, the desire for stricter gun laws has been on the rise (Edwards-Levy). In fact, a 2015 poll showed that fifty-five percent of Americans believe that America’s current gun laws are not enough (Edwards-Levy). Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe describes the fight for stricter gun laws to The New York Times when he says, "It's like the hamster on the hamster wheel -- you just go round and round, something happens, everybody comes out and says, 'We need more gun restrictions,' and then it fades into the background" (Edwards-Levy). Many may argue, if a majority of Americans want stricter gun laws, then why do they not have them (Edwards-Levy). The answer is they will not be passed because of a large, powerful interest group called the National Rifle Association (Edwards-Levy). This interest group believes that the Second Amendment upholds the absolute right to bear arms, and its members are constantly lobbying Congress (Edwards-Levy). The NRA wields so much power that when ninety percent of American citizens desired background checks because of the 2012 Newtown shooting, no government action was

Open Document