Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relations between police and the public
The impact of technology on law enforcement
Effect Of Technology On Policing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relations between police and the public
With each growing day, it becomes apparent the relationship and trust between police officers and citizens are rapidly diminishing. Particularly, with recent cases where police officers have been found not guilty of fatally shooting an unarmed man, planting evidence to ensure the suspect face jail time, or just simply committing police brutality. Police officers are given the task of protecting citizens and property, enforce laws, making arrests, issue tickets, investigate crimes and testify in court. However, who is given the responsibility to assure officers are not abusing their powers. Therefore, to ensure police officers are actively performing the duties of their job body cameras should be implemented to assure safety, accountability, …show more content…
Concerns about the intrusion of privacy and breach of Fourth Amendment Right presents many difficulties and can deter many police department from equipping their officer with body cameras. However, because of the complication, the endorsement by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who does not like the increased use of body cameras to keep tabs on citizens, but recognize that body camera can result in the reduction of use-of-force incidents and assist in holding law enforcement more accountable to the community. In the article, it states, “the ACLU advocates that most privacy protections will have to come from restrictions on subsequent retention and use of the recordings. The ACLU recommends the following policies to assist a department in protecting privacy rights: (1) Recording should be limited to uniformed officers and marked vehicles, so people know what to expect. An exception should be made for SWAT raids and similar planned uses of force when they involve non-uniformed officers… etc.”(RAMIREZ) In other words, the ACLU advocacy and recommendation for privacy policies lighten the load and risk for police departments to acquire body cameras. Therefore, the burden that faced by citizens and police officers regarding privacy is resolved knowing that a civil liberty group, ACLU, are helping to implement proper policies to protect
Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians, law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be fitted with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around. I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s actions when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in courtrooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situation in question.
However, protection of our citizen’s privacy is of utmost importance. Police and other law enforcement agencies have to learn to work with and around the laws in order to get their job done.
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
One of the sources used to disprove that body camera isn’t the answer includes Jamelle Bouie article, Keeping the Police honest. Mr. Bouie is the chief political correspondent at Slate who graduated from the University of Virginia with a political and social thought degree (Tumblr.com). His work consists of issues relating to national politics, public policies and racial inequality. His work has also been published in Slate online magazine, the New Yorker, the Washington Post and TIME Magazine (Tumblr.com). Slate is an online magazine that post about the news, politics, business, technology and culture (slate.com). In Jamelle article, Keeping the Police honest he talks about incidents where police officers were being recorded and took excessive
“A body-worn camera in public policing is a miniature audio and video recording device which allows recording of officers’ duties and citizen interaction,” notes Thomas K. Bud. Police body-cameras are significantly growing in popularity across Canada. While legislation has not confirmed definite rules regarding the use of body-cameras, local police departments have begun their implementation. Canadian police services involved in these projects include Toronto, Victoria, Edmonton, Calgary, and Amherstburg Police Services. The results of these projects have revealed mixed thoughts regarding body-camera effectiveness. Is it a good idea for police to wear body-cameras? While the cost of police wearing body cameras seems prohibitive, police wearing
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
Since their inception, police body cameras have been a controversial topic as many do not agree on their effectiveness and legality. To the trained eye, body cameras clearly have no negatives other than the sheer cost of their implementation. Some people, nonetheless, do believe that it is an encroachment of privacy for police to record private and/or public interactions even though it is purely legal. While that may be seen as a negative, it is wholly subjective and must be completely ignored when considering the factual analysis of police body camera use that is necessary to verify their validity. When only taking fact into account, there is no way to deny the nearly infinite benefits of body cameras.
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease the amount of complaints against police officers, and lastly it will decrease the amount of police abuse of authority. In addition, an officer is also more likely to behave in a more appropriate manner that follows standard operating procedures when encountering a civilian. “A 2013 report by the Department of Justice found that officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present” (Griggs, Brandon). Critics claim that the use of body cameras is invasive of the officers and civilians privacy.
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
Cameras have become a large debate in the fight against brutality for the main reason of privacy. It was said by Richard D. Emery that police themselves and other public figures should not expect privacy. They are always in sight and every action of an officer can be seen whether they are aware of it or not. It is an officer’s job to know the limit of force and to also report other officers pushing that limit. The instillation of cameras on officers and in their vehicle’s is for officer and civilian safety. It is also the only “way both the public and the accused police officers be more assured of a fair assessment of police actions” (Emery). Some departments have already begun installing more
A police body camera is a video recording system that is used by law enforcers to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence at crime scenes. Police body cameras are an essential change that the American public and law enforcement desperately need. Every year there are complaints of police officers allegedly using their power and weapons in ways that may or may not have followed correct police procedures. There are also cases where the officers’ reports differ from the suspect’s account of what really happened. Having a police body camera will help determine the truth because of the video evidence.
Many numerous police officers have been given body cameras over the last few months. Due to this, there have been videos that were made public which caused an outcry throughout the country. With the increase in body cameras over the country, there has been many setbacks and potential benefits that
The recent coverage of police killings have raised many questions and concerns and created lots of debates on law enforcement agencies and the proposal for police body cameras. As technology is growing at a rapid pace, Public Safety Administrations are taking full advantage of the new emerging technologies and implementing them into their programs in order to promote safety throughout the communities. Many law enforcement agencies are taking a full advantage of the body worn camera program as it has already impacted many agencies throughout the Unites States. Body cameras without a doubt accumulate important proof of police wrongdoing, and in spite of the fact that exploration on the impacts of body cameras is similarly constrained there
In recent years, police wearing body cameras has been gaining a lot of support and popularity. However, body cameras are more complex than most people realize. Cameras can be exceedingly expensive and raise privacy concerns for those being recorded. “But, the use of police body cameras is supported across political and racial demographics, as the following graphs (“Police Body Cameras.”).” There are countless cases of misconduct that have no evidence to prove someone guilty.
Stanley, Jay. "Accountability vs. Privacy: The ACLU's Recommendations on Police Body Cameras." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., 09 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 May 2014.