Argumentative Argument On Adoption

1083 Words3 Pages

“In the U.S. 397,122 children are living without permanent families in the foster care system. 101,666 of these children are eligible for adoption, but nearly 32% of these children will wait over three years in foster care before being adopted” (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012, p. 20). Adoption is complex as different people have different views. Two types of views on adoption are it can be beneficial, and it can be harmful. These two sides have a common ground of focusing on the best interest of the children; of these two sides, the side supporting the benefits of adoption has the stronger argument.
(Ext) One side of the argument is covered by J.C. Wilke (2003), a physician and author of the article “Life Issues Connector,” …show more content…

She argued that adoptees develop a syndrome know as Adopted Child Syndrome which changes the children’s behavior (p. 27). (Ser) Carangelo (2005) argued the syndrome causes lying, stealing, learning disabilities, difficulties maintaining relationships, and antisocial behaviors (p. 26). Adopted child syndrome results from the lack of bonding between a child and his or her biological mother (p. 26). An adoptee named Jean Paton conduct research in 1953 on the families involved in sealed adoption (cited in Carangelo, 2005, p. 27). Paton described the adoptees as being passive, hostile and dependent behaviors (cited in Carangelo, 2005, p. 27). According to Carangelo (2005), Paton was the one that defined and had created the term Adopted Child Syndrome (p. 28). Then the author Carangelo (2005) mentions research done by Dr. David Kirschner. Kirschner stated the term Adopted Child Syndrome is an underlying of Dissociative Disorder (cited in Carangelo, 2005, p. 28). The most common ACS behaviors are truancy, preoccupation with excess fantasy, pathological lying, stealing, and running away, according to Carangelo (2005, p. 28). Carangelo (2005) stated that adoptees also have difficulties with learning, under achieving, over achieving, lack of impulse control, and fascination with fire (p. …show more content…

Both of the articles have different views on adoption, but their main goal is determining the best option for the children. The first fact cited by Wilke (2003) is that 95% of parents said they had a strong attachment to their adopted child (p. 22). Wilke (2003) then quoted the Search Institute Study “Adopted adolescents self-esteem was as high as or higher than their peers” (p. 22). In contrast, Carangelo (2005) believed that the children are better off with their birth mother. Carangelo (2005) cited the violence against the adoptees parents where two adopted children set the house on fire and killed their parents (p. 31). Although Wilke and Carangelo both have different opinions, they both focus on what is best for the children. The second common ground of both these articles is the psychological health of the children. The first fact cited by Wilke (2003) is that 75% of adopted adolescents are psychologically healthy (p. 22). Wilke (2003) compares that rate against children raised by a single mother. Wilke (2003) stated that adopted children are healthier than children of single mothers (p. 23). In contrast, Carangelo (2005) stated that 23% of all adopted children would have Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) (p. 29). Also Carangelo (2005) noted, the children become pathological liars and have a fascination with fire leading them to

Open Document