Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The new world of police accountability
Restorative justice and deterrence
Restorative justice and deterrence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The new world of police accountability
There are many people in the United states who have been convicted of a crime, but later proven innocent, and due to this their lives are ruined. Every state needs to work to help those people get back on their feet, giving compensation, firing those who, unjustly, put them in prison, and help with housing and a job. Those who have been proven innocent should be compensated because the time they spend in prison will cause them to lose their jobs, and have no source of salary to support themselves. If the judge sentenced someone to prison, knowing they are innocent, they should be sent to fired, and legally unable to become a judge anywhere else, and spend time in prison, and the same should go to police officers who abuse their power. There’s …show more content…
Anyone who spends eleven months and two weeks in prison will be given the sixty thousand, all do with fairness to the person, and also as an apology from the state. Sixty thousand seems like a bit much, and it won’t just come out of taxpayers’ pockets, because it won’t stop the police, and judges, from imprisoning innocent people. Instead the money will come from: police station’s budget, judges wallet, budget and donation from prisons and just a bit from taxpayers. Police stations will pay thirty-five percent of the sixty thousand, which will be twenty-one thousand, and the judges will also pay thirty-five percent. They will pay for a majority of the money because they are most responsible for imprisoning an innocent person. This will teach them to be careful, and try to make sure they don’t purposely convict an innocent man. The prisons these people stay in will pay twenty-five percent of the sixty thousand, which would be fifteen thousand, and they won’t be allowed to use the money meant to be used for the prisoners, like food budget. Conditions in prisons are horrible, and those who are innocent may be harassed, or worse, by an inmate, and for this reason they will pay twenty-five percent. This percentage can be thirty five, and the judges will be twenty-five, depending if on how the person was treated in prison, and if it was an honest mistake of the judge. Lastly, the taxpayers will only pay five percent, which will be three thousand. The people’s money shouldn’t spend much of the compensation because the police arrested an innocent man. Any money still missing will be paid by the police, judges, or the
Prison litigation is a form of lawsuit process with which prisoners seek relief from prison. The Prison litigation Reform Act clearly outlines an increase in the litigation of prison cases that was enacted in 1996. Through such litigations, inmates are able to fight for their rights and fair treatment in prison. For instance among the prison ligations, we have prospective relieve where one can file a lawsuit to request the prison to change some of their policies to let one for example pray amongst groups. Exhaustion of remedies for administration also allows for one to articulate grievances against the prison official before suing them. Emotional or mental injuries are among other issues of prison litigation addressed in this prison litigation
For police officers who want to solve more violent, severed cases, it is practically impossible for them to make as much as the officers making arrests for petty, nonviolent drug crimes. More often than not, law enforcement officers are paid based on the amount of arrests they pay. Why would an officer pursue more rape, murder, and burglary cases when they could simple make a few easy drug arrests and get paid the same amount or more with half the work? “The financial incentive built into the system virtually guarantee that the overwhelming majority of drug arrest in the United States will be for nonviolent, low-level drug offenses,” as stated by Michelle Alexander, a civil right advocate and writer. As the amount of petty, drug arrests for nonviolent offenses increases, the respect for police officers and the laws they’re trying to enforce is lost. Although it is not the officer’s fault to blame, the current judicial system pins them up as the bad guy. Making it so that the current system not only hurts those being convicted, but also all the law enforcement involved. With the way the system is set up now, it police officers unable to solve difficult crimes. Drug crimes are easy arrests, and the frequency of them makes causes a police officer’s ability to solve real, hard-hitting cases virtually nonexistent. As for the judges involved, the minimum sentencing requirements basically make it impossible for the judges to actually do their job. With the mandatory minimum sentencing for nonviolent drug crimes, it takes the judge’s ability to serve justice out of the equation. No matter what the individual case may be, there’s no way for an offender to get anything less than that of the mandatory minimum. It’s practically ridding these citizens of the right to a fair trial; seeing that no matter what the judge rules as fair,
The American people rely on the justice system set up by our founding fathers to uphold certain standards of fairness and equality. Society is brainwashed into believing that the justice system is to flaw and bad people are supposed to go to jail. However, this has not been the case for many years due to corruption in the Supreme Court followed by the Federal Courts and other inferior state courts. The American justice system has taken on a life of its own, following theories of fairness that are no longer connected to the needs of a free society. Instead of a justice system that weeds out the good from the evil, power has been given to the prosecutors, finding a good lawyer is harder than it seems, and rules have become unconstitutional.
Prisons require an abundance of money to be run properly and effectively. By using taxes to pay for prisons the American public pays to support the lives of inmates and all of their needs. Prisoners require food, drink, beds, supplies for doing other activities and all of the overlooked things in normal life that go along with these necessities. Inmates have special needs like all of us do. Inmates reguire medical care, for example some have AIDS or other diseases that require medicine which cumulate large bills over time.(Luzadder) Imagine the money amassed over a life sentence of paying for medicine. The American public pays for all of these expenses added to the actual building of the prison f...
As many people begin to examine the debate of whether or not the death penalty should be inflicted upon those who commit such heinous crimes in the United States, are finding flaws in the system. One of those flaws being that the cost of executing someone on death row is much higher than someone sentenced to life-without-parole. This may come as a shock to many people due to the fact that it costs a sufficient amount of money to provide food, shelter, and security to the people sentenced to a lifetime in prison. This forces much of society to question whether such funds
Rights of Prisoners While lawful incarceration deprives prisoners of most of America's Constitutional rights, they do maintain a few constitutional rights. Federal courts, while hesitant to impede the internal administration of prisons, will interfere to rectify violations of the constitutional rights that prisoners are still entitled to. A prison guideline that oversteps a prisoner’s constitutional rights is lawful only if it is reasonably related to the safety of the inmates or the rehabilitation of that prisoner. The Supreme Court has acknowledged four significant factors in determining the rationality of a prison guideline. Courts should contemplate whether there is a lawful, sensible association between the guideline and the reasonable interest advanced to justify it, whether different means for exercising the proclaimed right continue to exist, whether accommodation of the proclaimed right will unfavorably disturb guards, other inmates, and distribution of prison properties generally, and whether there is a noticeable substitute to the guideline that fully accommodated the prisoner’s right that would not cause a problem to the prison, guards or other inmates, as well as hinder the offenders rehabilitation process.
Discrimination against the minority population is a major problem in the United States society’s justice system. There are many examples where African American and low-income minorities are treated differently and not given the chance to prove their innocence. The law enforcement promises to treat all men or women equal opportunity, but the same system has put 120,000 innocent African Americans in prison. While most of them still remain in prisons, injustice by law enforcements is still a burden to the minorities in America. Moreover, wrongful conviction is a horrible injustice when a person spends years in jail. This is getting recognized by the U.S. system but often late. In many cases by the time a person is proven innocent, he or she might
The justice system in America is a failure and should be immediately reformed to a more standardized system that encourages reform over punishment. This is clearly evidenced by the 76.6% of prisoners that are rearrested within five years of release, the inequality of sentencing based on race or socioeconomic class, and the widely varying prison terms, which in many cases do not fit the crimes committed.
Living in the twenty first century Americans would like to believe that they are living in the land of the free, where anyone and everyone can live an ordinary life without worrying that they will be arrested on the spot for doing absolutely nothing. The sad truth, with the evidence to prove it, is that this American Dream is not all that it appears to be. It has been corrupted and continues to be everyday by the racism that is in the criminal justice system of America. Racism has perpetuated the corruption of the criminal justice system from aspect of the initial stop, the sentencing in court, all the way to the life of an inmate in the prison. There seems to be nothing stopping it as it continues to grow
Nowadays how many people remember the story of Rodney King? The Rodney King beating was the incident that really brought to the public eye the extremes some police take their brand of justice. Every day now you hear more and more stories of the increasing amounts of police brutality at it does not seem to be stopping. We can always argue that the police are justified in their sometimes questionable methods in stopping criminals, but they do not all fall under this category. As Terry Mark once said “Thinking before acting is wisdom, but acting before thinking is regret.” Most cops could be said to embody the latter portion of that quote. There must be more done to curb the amount of cases that get reported. There are many ways to address this
In the United States, there are about 500 prisoners for every 100,000 residents. So, it is no surprise that our country has the highest incarceration rate in the world. In my opinion, this statistic would be lower if the prisons were tougher, making the prisoners scared to come back. The punishments used in our country’s prisons today are far more lenient than they used to be. In this paper, I will discuss what prison should be like, the goals of prison, and the differences between two American prison models (Pennsylvania and Auburn) and their benefits and drawbacks. This paper will also explain which model was more successful and why.
Within our police system in America, there are gaps and loopholes that give leeway to police officials who either abuse the authority given to them or do not represent the ethical standards that they are expected to live up to by society. Because of the nature of police work, there is a potential for deterioration of these ethical and moral standards through deviance, misconduct, corruption, and favoritism. Although these standards are set in place, many police officers are not held accountable for their actions and can easily get by with the mistreatment of others because of their career title. While not every police abuses his or her power, the increasingly large percentage that do present a problem that must be recognized by the public as well as those in charge of police departments throughout our country. Police officials are abusing their power and authority through three types of misconduct known as malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance and these types are being overlooked by management personnel who rarely intervene even though they know what is happening. Misconduct is wrong because it violates rights and causes people to be wrongly accused of crimes or be found not guilty and set free when they are still an endangerment to other people. The public needs to be educated on what is happening in the police system in hopes that someone will speak out to protect citizens from being violated by police officers.
The research study is to describe how there are more African Americans in prison than any other race Whether it is African American men or women in the prison African Americans are still the leading race inside the prison system. Based upon the research I was setting out to prove that African Americans were the leading race in the prison systems, but sometimes people don’t always understand why or how some people economic status and education can play a hug part on where the direction of their lives take them. The main in this study was to determine if African Americans are the leading race in the prison system. So I set out to find out if “there are more African Americans from ages eighteen thru thirty are in prison at a greater percentage than White or Hispanics”. Imprisonment was and still is a form of criminal punishment that became well known in the United States after the American Revolution.
Our laws have allowed individuals to slip through the cracks of our justice system. Criminals who have raped and killed have walked on technicalities. The results have left the officers with a sense of failure by the system. Some police officers have taken matters in their own hands.
A few issues are the police officers themselves, the court system, and simply knowing what to do in certain situations. I have three recommendations that help these issues such as body cameras, a special court system, and retraining police officers. First, the body camera idea has been floating around the news lately. As previously stated, President Obama has funded these cameras and they will be implemented soon, however, I would like to recommend on how to use them. The camera could be on the waist of the officer along with their utility belt. The cameras must be turned on during their shift and turned off at the end. At the end of the day, someone will review the camera footage and write reports on the officers. The pros of this recommendation is the feedback and seeing the actions of the police officers to be used in the courts, while the cons could be people inferring with the footage or the officers blocking the camera somehow. The cost of these cameras is the consequence, because there are an abundance of police stations and for every cop to have a body camera would cost millions of dollars. My second recommendation would be establishing a special court system that handles murders committed by police officers. The judge could review the body camera tape, hear both sides, and then make his or her decision. It could reduce rioting and uproar within communities. A pro of this court system is simply