Arguement Against Shankara’s Ideas of Reality

847 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strength and weaknesses of dualism

Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta means the end or completion of knowledge and also means “the end of Veda.” It originated from the Upanishads (sitting near the teacher) and is the Hindu Philosophy of the non- dualistic school. Shankara explains Vedanta in greater details in the Crest- Jewel of Discrimination, which are timeless teachings on nonduality. Vedanta’s main goal is to sustain that human life is to recognize Brahman which is the crucial reality and to be combined with the mystical ground of the universe. Shankara believes that Brahman is the one true reality and everything else is just delusion. Atman which is the personal self is but Brahman simply. In this paper I will argue with Shankara’s idea that something can only be real if it doesn’t change or never stops existing is incorrect, because temporary things are still real. After all nothing in this world ever lasts forever. Also if this world is not considered to be real then there is not a reason to live.
Shankara states that “BRAHMAN- the absolute existence, knowledge and bliss is real. The universe is not real. Brahman and Atman (man’s inner Self) are one.” (Viveka-Chudamani, p.7) Shankara accepts things as “real” only if they don’t change and never ceases to exist. “No object, no kind of knowledge, can be absolutely real if its existence is only temporary. Absolute reality implies permanent existence. Every object of knowledge, external or internal for a thought or idea is as much an object of knowledge as in the eternal world is subject to modification and therefore, by Shankara’s definition, “not real.” (Viveka-Chudamani, p.8) Temporary things are still real though, because after all nothing lasts forever. We humans actually only live to a certain age,...

... middle of paper ...

...ure and refer to Him as Iswara or the lord of the universe.
Shankara says the world is illusory, not since it does not have an existence, but because it is always altering, unsteady, temporary and obligated to obliteration and deterioration. It is a presence, a plan of God, a hallucination, an incorrect reality, which our minds take for, granted and which we fallaciously consider as genuine and everlasting. It exists because of our awareness of duality and will vanish when we experience non-duality or unite with Brahman. When we overpower delusion and unattached ourselves from the sense matters we understand the unity of existence and develop conscious of illusive nature of the world. Although I find the world to be perfectly real and what makes it more real is the fact that it’s altering, unsteady, and temporary and obligated to obliteration and deterioration.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Karen Armstrong And Robert Thurman

    1658 Words  | 4 Pages

    To live in a world without human connection, is to live an empty and meaningless life. Both Karen Armstrong, and Robert Thurman, highlight the necessity of human contact throughout their essays. In his text “Wisdom,” Robert Thurman shows us the path to discover the selflessness of what we believe is our true and actual self. He claims that no matter how hard one might try to find themselves, they will only find a rigid, fixated self. But when we finally accept our selflessness and turn away from our egos, we can become compassionate and experience the void, which he defines as a free and boundless self. Additionally, Karen Armstrong debates that the universe is driven by concepts such as “Being,” and “Brahman,” which both represent the ultimate

    Read More

  • The All-Powerful Mind: An Overview of Subjective and Objective Idealism

    1983 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will examine the reliability of George Berkeley’s metaphysical theory of Idealism. Berkeley’s Idealism holds that reality is made real by what the mind perceives and that what we perceive to be material is really a collection of immaterial sensations. Idealism is defined as the view “that only mental entities exist, so physical things exist only in the sense that they are perceived” (“Idealism”). Berkeley’s argument of Subjective Idealism is the view that reality consists of one’s mind and its ideas, while Objective Idealism says in addition, a supreme mind produces ideas in the physical world that do not depend on human minds to exist (Velasquez 146). Without Objective Idealism, one can undergo solipsism which is the belief that only one’s self and experiences of the world are real and everything else does not exist (“Solipsism”). Opposing Idealism is the metaphysical view of Materialism which holds that only physical things exist (“Materialism”). This paper will start by examining George Berkeley’s views of Subjective and Objective Idealism and how they apply to reality. Then, the critiques made and supported by Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes against both views of Idealism will be argued. However, these arguments fail to properly examine Berkeley’s Idealism, thus causing the critiques to be based upon misinformation. Although the criticisms pose potential flaws, Berkeley’s Idealism continues to be a major discussion in the metaphysical debate.

    Read More

  • The Heart of Understanding, by Thich Nhat Hanh

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    The word interbeing explains the concept of emptiness through the idea of changeable and interdependent existence. The prefix “inter-” defines the changeable and interdependent nature of things and the verb “to be or being” means existence. According to the Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra, “Form is emptiness, and emptiness is form.” Emptiness does not mean that things do not exist but rather it means that things cannot exist by themselves alone. Thich Nhat Hanh uses an interesting example of paper to explain changeable and interdependent existence of things. Paper cannot exist without the trees from which it is made. Trees cannot exist or grow without rainwater which comes from clouds. Every aspect of existence is interrelated to each other. Paper and trees, trees and rain, rain and clouds are all manifestations of interbeing with each other.

    Read More

  • The Ultimate of Reality: Reversible Causality

    3402 Words  | 7 Pages

    In accordance with the ontological standpoint, there are also different meanings of reality: "the totality of phenomena connected according to necessary rules" (Kant); "the perfectly ordered whole" (Hegel); "the sum total of all its being and events now" (James); "the complete totality of things"; "a coherent or integrated system of systems such as the physical, the biological, the chemical and the social" (Bunge); "the all-embracing universe including mind as well as matter"; "the totality of objects and events"; "the system of natural existencies, forces, changes, and events", or "the entire material universe and its phenomena".

    Read More

  • The Relation of Consciousness to the Material World

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... matter to forms of existence in the mind, for example to argue along with Berkeley (1710) that material events only exist in so far as they are perceived to exist (idealism). Idealism has its modern defenders, for example in some interpretations of the observer effect in quantum mechanics (the view that the Shrodinger wave equation only collapses into an actuality once an observation is made). In the macroworld it may also be true that the world as-perceived only exists if there are perceivers (Velmans 1990). However, as a general theory of the ontology of macroevents this position has its own well-known problems. It might be that the material world cannot have an appearance without perceivers, but it seems counterintuitive that its very existence is similarly vulnerable. Closing one's eyes, for example, does not seem to be enough to make unpleasant events go away.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Meditations By Descartes

    1169 Words  | 3 Pages

    Here’s a way to visualize this concept of existing: suppose that everything you think you know about the physical world is false. Instead, there is an evil genius who is

    Read More

  • Descartes Sixth Meditation

    1379 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his sixth meditation must return to the doubts he raised in his first meditation. In this last section of his sixth meditation he deals mainly with the mind-body problem; and he tries to prove whether material things exist with certainly. In this meditation he develops his Dualist argument; by making a distinction between mind and body; although he also reveals their rather significant relationship.

    Read More

  • Zen Tradition

    1022 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kasulis writes "emptiness, which is the logical interdependence of opposing terms, lies at the basis of all philosophical distinction." Nagarjuna believed that we could work inside the world of duality while we identify its relativity. Kasulis says that we should "consider Nagarjuna's emphasis on the nondifferentiating, nonobjectifying insight or wisdom."

    Read More

  • Descartes Knowledge

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    our existence in reality is a question which philosophers have tackled throughout time. This essay will look at the

    Read More

  • Natural Man Lewis Thomas Analysis

    1053 Words  | 3 Pages

    Without perception, in our illusions and hallucinations, we lose “our sense of beings,” (Capra). Lost in “isolation,” (Capra) perhaps lost within our own illusion, our abstractions, we lose the ability to judge, to dichotomize, reality from illusions, right from wrong.

    Read More

  • Notions of Selflessness in Sartrean Existentialism and Theravadin Buddhism

    4179 Words  | 9 Pages

    ABSTRACT: In this essay I examine the relationship between Sartre's phenomenological description of the "self" as expressed in his early work (especially Being and Nothingness) and elements to be found in some approaches to Buddhism. The vast enormity of this task will be obvious to anyone who is aware of the numerous schools and traditions through which the religion of Buddhism has manifested itself. In order to be brief, I have decided to select specific aspects of what is commonly called the Theravadin tradition as being representative of Buddhist philosophy. By choosing to look primarily at the Theravadin tradition, I am by necessity ignoring a vast number of other Buddhist approaches. However, in my view, the Theravadin sect presents a consistent Buddhist philosophy which is representative of many of the major trends within Buddhism.

    Read More

  • The Lacanian Psychoanalysis Of Desire In Narcissus And Goldmund

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...t” (310). The reasons you cannot exist with your ‘real’ I suggest is the idea that the real exists beyond so many things such as language and symbolism, which are arguably a majority of the world we inhabit.

    Read More

  • Commentary on The Heart Sutra

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    My own personal commentary shall emphasize the ultimate truth about emptiness is realizing all is empty, even the knowledge and practices that allow us to realize it. In this way, Buddhism turns in on itself, negating the existence of its own essence. I also pay special attention to the training of the bodhisattva, who has gained superior insight, and therefore practices the perfection of wisdom in a particular way.

    Read More

  • Debating the Topics Monism and Vedanta

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Philosophical way on humanity, for centuries philosophers have debated on a topic called Monism. Monists hold the principle that being is purely based upon one critic “category of being” this means that either the person is made up of only the body or only the mind (Morris). Because Animists, Hindus, and Buddhists believe that reality is one and that everything that exists is a functioning part of that whole which is spirit are for the most part monists. Western people for the most part may be called a monist also as they believe that God is dead and matter is the only substance to reality. As a consequence, monism is the claim that mind and matter essentially the same. The concept of transcendental reality (spiritual) in terms of Vedanta is the essential philosophy original to the Hindus. The major ideas of Vedanta are, first, the ultimate existence. A strong hold that all the things we see around us are ultimately reducible to one substance/one existence. But we claim it to be the essential philosophy of all religions, which makes it Non-Western Religious more than Non-Western Philosophy.

    Read More

  • Examining the Newtonian Worldview

    1561 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...it would mean something different to each individual. It would be utterly futile to attempt to describe an objective reality which is nonexistent.

    Read More

More about Arguement Against Shankara’s Ideas of Reality

Open Document