Anonymous Sperm and Egg Donation Anonymous sperm and egg donation is a serious topic. Some people think they should remain anonymous and some do not. A few reasons for becoming known donors are legal rights, medical reasons, and psychological problems. The parents and donor kids should know where the sperm or egg came from because it might affect their futures. Medical risks are a huge deal that everyone needs to be aware of, but especially those who are not sure where they came from. Donor children who do not know who their donor is or are looking for their biological parent, may grow up to have problems psychologically. Children have the right to know their biological background. There are many views on sperm and egg donation. Some people would say that the donor child has no legal right to know their donor parent. But some say otherwise. Everyone has a legal right to know where he or she came from. The donor child and the parent that raised them should know the donor parent. The parent should know where their child is coming from and the child should know, too. Ms. Pratten, a donor child, mentioned, “It is very disappointing. All we were asking for is the same benefits of adopted people. They've [the B.C. court] basically said, 'No, you can’t have that.' And they've basically said that it's okay for the government to discriminate” (qtd in Bains). She pretty much explained it perfectly. The courts are discriminating donor children. If adopted kids can know who their biological parents are, why can donor kids not? Men who donate sperm change peoples’ ideas of fatherhood. People think that donating sperm is a good thing and the donor children should be happy they were born, but they do not know the side effects of being a donor ch... ... middle of paper ... ...2014. Laurance, Jeremy. "So Who's the Daddy? Ethics Dilemma Over Sperm Donor Boom." The Independent. 02 Apr. 2012: 6. SIRS Issues Researcher.Web. 05 May. 2014. Miller, Cheryl. "Who's Your Daddy?." Reason Vol. 40, No. 9. Feb. 2009: 40-46. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 09 May. 2014. Quan, Douglas. "Reveal Sperm Donor, Court Urged." National Post. 26 Oct. 2010: A.7. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 09 May. 2014. Sheldon, T. (2002, March 16). Children at risk after sperm donor develops late onset genetic disease. Retrieved July 6, 2011, from British Medical Journal: Smoot, John M. "Why Sperm Donation Is Bad for Dads and Kids." Public Discourse. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014. "Sperm and Egg Donors, Anonymity." Debatewise. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014. "This House Believes Sperm and Egg Donors Should Retain Their Anonymity." Idebate.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014.
When viewing organ donation from a moral standpoint we come across many different views depending on the ethical theory. The controversy lies between what is the underlying value and what act is right or wrong. Deciding what is best for both parties and acting out of virtue and not selfishness is another debatable belief. Viewing Kant and Utilitarianism theories we can determine what they would have thought on organ donation. Although it seems judicious, there are professionals who seek the attention to be famous and the first to accomplish something. Although we are responsible for ourselves and our children, the motives of a professional can seem genuine when we are in desperate times which in fact are the opposite. When faced with a decision about our or our children’s life and well being we may be a little naïve. The decisions the patients who were essentially guinea pigs for the first transplants and organ donation saw no other options since they were dying anyways. Although these doctors saw this as an opportunity to be the first one to do this and be famous they also helped further our medical technology. The debate is if they did it with all good ethical reasoning. Of course they had to do it on someone and preying upon the sick and dying was their only choice. Therefore we are responsible for our own health but when it is compromised the decisions we make can also be compromised.
In kilner’s case study “Having a baby the new-fashioned way”, present a story that can be relatable to a lot of families struggling to have a child. This is a dilemma that can be controversial and ethical in own sense. The couple that were discussed in the case study were Betty and Tom. Betty and Tom who are both in their early forties who have struggled to bear children. Dr. Ralph Linstra from Liberty University believes that “Fertility can be taken for granted”. Dr. Ralph talks about how many couples who are marriage may run into an issue of bearing a child and turn to “medical science” to fix the issue. He discusses that “God is author of life and he can open and close the womb”. That in it’s self presents how powerful God.
...cy “we” give “birth mother” and agencies being exposed because of what we might find in adoptees records is just a way to keep stuff away from the people who rightfully deserve the right to know. (The Baltimore Sun ).
Many studies have been done pertaining to egg donation and its medical aspect, but very few studies shows the ethical implications of egg donations. Health Laws such as Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act,1992 regulates the advertisement of success rate of fertility clinic. Only few states have federal laws for informed consent from egg donors (1-3). Informed consent means that donor understands all the minor details surrounding the egg donation procedure, its side-effects- medical, legal, ethical and emotional and gives permission to undergo the procedure without hesitation or coercion.
Donor-assisted insemination is a process that enables a woman to conceive a child through the donated sperm/egg of a male or female. Donor insemination is a technique that has been used around the world for fifty eight years. This technique is often used in situations where a man or woman suffer from infertility and are unable to produce children on their own. Donor-insemination is also used to help gay people or single people have children. In these cases, the child grow up to never know their genetic father/mother. The children born from donor- assisted reproduction only have access to basic, non-identifying information such as: race, height, eye-color, etc. This is not enough information to settle the donor-inseminated (DI) children's desire to know about their parents. I personally think the DI children have a natural right to know where they came from. Many DI children say that knowing about their genetic parent is something that they desire more than anything in the world. These children have a right to know about their genetic background, not only for themselves, but for their children as well.
What is a sperm bank? This is a place where the semen is kept in cold storage for use in artificial insemination. This is the technique used by a couple to get the baby without having sexual intercourse. This method involved third party as a sperm donor. In addition, the sperm donor will be paid for every single donation he has done. It becomes more popular among the couples who cannot conceive their own baby and nowadays, many lesbian couples and single person used this kind of method too. Some people may say, “it’s interesting and easy,” but it is not so interesting if you know what kind of consequences the sperm bank will give you. Indeed, there are many bad effects of using a sperm bank such as spreading the diseases, affecting relationship problems and leading to hidden costs. First of all, the diseases spread by the sperm donation is one of the consequences of using a sperm bank. Many of us think that this sperm bank is the best and secured method to be applied. On the other hand, it has been reported by De Standaard and Het Nieuwsbald as cited in Torfs, M. (2013) that a sperm bank in Ghent is being a cause of two children infected by a disease named Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or Von Recklinghausen’s disease. Furthermore, based on the next investigation, the children from the same sperm bank are also suffering the same disease in another place. It is not as safe as we think. It must be due to some of the procedures that lead to some serious bad effects. A donor can pass a genetic condition to at least five babies. It is good if the donor gives you such a perfect baby, however can you imagine if you are using a sperm bank, your future baby will be suffering the same disease as mentioned before? Besides, according to the E...
Fatherless has been one of the most important challenges and epidemics in our generation. The effects of growing up...
The addition of a child into a family’s home is a happy occasion. Unfortunately, some families are unable to have a child due to unforeseen problems, and they must pursue other means than natural pregnancy. Some couples adopt and other couples follow a different path; they utilize in vitro fertilization or surrogate motherhood. The process is complicated, unreliable, but ultimately can give the parents the gift of a child they otherwise could not have had. At the same time, as the process becomes more and more advanced and scientists are able to predict the outcome of the technique, the choice of what child is born is placed in the hands of the parents. Instead of waiting to see if the child had the mother’s eyes, the father’s hair or Grandma’s heart problem, the parents and doctors can select the best eggs and the best sperm to create the perfect child. Many see the rise of in vitro fertilization as the second coming of the Eugenics movement of the 19th and early 20th century. A process that is able to bring joy to so many parents is also seen as deciding who is able to reproduce and what child is worthy of birthing.
Commercial surrogacy is a controversial topic that is being discussed all over the world between individuals and government. Both of these groups have examined the ethics of commercial surrogacy, one of the main issues they have the money being used for a child’s birth. Due to the fact that not a lot of people in the world agree on this methods, many countries have banded commercial surrogacy. Most of the United States and United Kingdom have banned commercial surrogacy.
Whittaker Hughes, Susan. “The only Americans legally prohibited from knowing who their birth parents are: a rejection of privacy rights as a bar to adult adoptees' access to original birth and adoption records.” Cleveland State Law Review. 55.3 (Summer 2007): p429-461. Academic OneFile. Web. 17 Feb. 2012.
To say that women are unable to consider the risks of egg donation for themselves, and are unable of making decisions based on the consideration of these risks, is not a feminist explanation, but an oppressing one.
One of these moral dilemmas is that genetic engineering changes the traditional dynamic that occurs between the parent and the offspring. This issue arose over the possibility of having a human embryo with three genetic parents which is now possible due to genetic engineering. The procedure in question “involves transplanting the chromosomes from a single-cell embryo or from an unfertilized egg into a donor egg or embryo from which the chromosomes have been removed”(Foht). The procedure itself is very useful for women with mitochondrial disorders but the issue involved with this is that the embryo would technically have three biological parents. There needs to be a real concern about “the way genetic engineering can alter the relationship between the generations from one of parents accepting the novelty and spontaneous uniqueness of their children to one where parents use biotechnology to choose and control the biological nature of their children”(Foht). There is a special relationship between children and their parents that may be disappearing very soon due to these techniques. Children could be born never truly knowing one of their genetic parents. If these procedures continue to prosper people will have to “accept arrangements that split apart the various biological and social aspects of parenthood, and that deliberately create
Test tube babies have long been stigmatized by society as the unnatural results of scientific dabbling. The words `test tube baby' have been used by school children as an insult, and many adults have seen an artificial means of giving birth as something perhaps only necessary for a lesbian woman, or a luxury item only available to the elite few. The reality is that assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have been helping infertile couples have children since 1978.1 The methods of in vitro fertilization, it's variants, and the other ART procedures are ways for persons that would otherwise have no hope of conception to conceive and, in a rapidly growing percentage of cases, give birth to healthy babies. As the technology has developed, the quality and range of assistance has developed as well. At present, the means of assisted reproduction and the capabilities of these procedures has grown at a somewhat dizzying pace. However, thought to the repercussions of the applications of ART are being disregarded to some extent while the public's knowledge and the understanding of embryologists and geneticists surges forward. It is possible given consideration to things such as the morality of these techniques, the unexplored alternative uses of these procedures, and the potential impact they posses that further development is unnecessary and possibly dangerous.
As a young adult, it may seem foolish to predict what your future family life will look like, especially in regards to children. Often times this reality is forced upon a select few, particularly homosexual couples; however, with the innovation of in vitro fertilization (IVF), a couple is met with promise and the hope of a successful family life. IVF can be described as a process by which a fetus is genetically formed in a laboratory setting. Though this process may seem unnatural in essence, it allows for a more diverse family arrangement through medical innovation. This procedure, though controversial, is seen by many as an advancement in the medical field and can be accredited to procuring a healthy child for an unfortunate family, whether
Determining whether to divulge the gender of a child should be a personal choice. Society should not dictate whether one chooses to disclose the sex of their child. At conception, the gender is determined by chromosome characteristics and it will be the male (male semen) that dictates whether the baby will be a boy or girl. Nowhere in any literature that has been read or published that it states that “society” is the determining factor whether a girl or boy will be conceived. Society suggests that knowing the gender is routine, but what may be considered routine for some is not necessarily customary for all. If one chooses to stray away from what is considered to be “normal” it poses or present an issue. Individuals are instantaneously met with opposition or back lash due to nondisclosure of the sex of their child whether it is unborn or born. A typical argument would be as to what color clothing to bring for the unborn or born child, should one bring pink or blu...