Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics summary on animal rights
Animal rights in the us
Arguments about animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics summary on animal rights
One specific rule that stands out to me in our legal regulations and in the Ten Commandments is that we shall not commit murder, but what we legalize and believe in is different from what our actions do and how we define and apply this rule. According to Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?, it indicates that not even animals are fully protected by God’s divine law, but are put here on earth to serve mankind. Although the words of God says that animals can be used as resources, God says humans may not waste or spoil an animal for no reason at all (Francione, 2007, p. 52). Currently we still evidence of thousands of animals being abused throughout the process of transferring them to slaughter houses, being killed in an inhumane manner, and witnessing …show more content…
But who is deserving from these protections? According to our federal and state laws there are only a limited amount of animals that are protected from being used as resources or abusement for example, in “…[T]he federal Animal Welfare Act… passed in 1966… stops the theft of dogs and cats –human property- for use in experiments” (Francione, 2007, p. 57). In some states laws it tells us which animals are not protected for example, “California [some law are]… not applicable to… the destruction of birds, the killing of venomous reptiles or other dangerous animals, the killing of animals for food, or the use of animals in experimentations” (Francione, 2007, p. 56). Comparing these laws to the words of God, God is not discriminate against any species of animals in regards to who shall serve mankind and who shall not. God said that all animals are free to use for human services (Francione, 2007, p. 52). Although in a sense God’s words may seem fair and equal, this practice is called speciesism which is another form of discrimination and promoting animal
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
" Thou shall not Kill." The act of killing is not only illegal; it is unjustifiable. Abortion, euthanasia, and suicide are all acts of murder. In each circumstance, a life is being terminated intentionally and the people involved are refusing to acknowledge God's intentions for human life.
Most would not put animals in the same category as humans so giving them the same rights seems quite ridiculous; since humans are supposed to be seen as the alpha species. What is a more realistic term is to consider them our property, because we continue to use animal testing and think it is okay to harm these animals. In the end, animal testing and research is cruel and should be done away with. It is a proven fact that animals feel pain just like humans do. No animal deserves to have his or her life purpose be to give his or her life unknowingly for science. We must to put an end to this cruelty and torture because just like humans, animals are living beings. No matter how it is perceived, it is cruel and unusual punishment.
of a dog, which appears to be crying. The size of the text is varied
Animal rights can defined as the idea that some, or all non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. Animal rights can help protect the animals who experience research and testing that could be fatal towards them. The idea of animal rights protects too the use of dogs for fighting and baiting. Finally, animal rights affects the farms across america, limiting what animals can be slaughtered. The bottom line is, there is too much being done to these animals that most do not know about.
The Seven Commandments are the basic principles of animalism worked out by the pigs and described originally as "unalterable laws" by which the animals were to live. The Seven Commandments were written on the barn wall for all animals to see and read if they could. The original Commandments are:
No animal shall kill any other animal -- No animal shall kill any other animal without cause.
This is a commandment that should be enforced because all the animals should want to treat
This has gone on for too long, and it needs to stop! The pigs have been treating us like slaves, like we are the dirt beneath their feet. We need to stand up for ourselves! They sit there and watch us on their nice comfy beds, just watching us work day in and day out, then they take all of our hard work for themselves giving us nothing in return. We don’t deserve to be treated like this! We do everything they say when they say it with no rights and no liberty. Is this how you want to live your lives? No rights, no freedom, no equality? I sure know that i don’t. The pigs are treating us unfairly and it is becoming unbearable. They are changing the 7 commandments right under our noses, now every amendment benefits nobody but them. They are breaking the original commandments excessively, and they are lying to us every single day.
Stiver, Randy. "God Did Not Make Animals the Moral Equivalent of Humans." The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 7 Mar. 2011.
... concept. An animal cannot follow our rules of morality, “Perhaps most crucially, what other species can be held morally accontable” (Scully 44). As a race humans must be humane to those that cannot grasp the concept. Animals do not posess human rights but they posess the right to welfare and proper treatment by their handlers.
There are those who will still fight for animal rights, but one might wonder if this issue isn't just an excuse for some twisted person to do bodily harm to another. "Brian Cass...was left with a three-inch head wound after the attack" (Cass). Here is a quote from the PETA celebrity spokesman, Bill Maher "To those people who say; My father is alive because of animal experimentation,' I say 'Yeah, well good for you. This dog died so your father could live. "Sorry , but I am just not behind that kind of trade off." What kind of attitude is that? Perhaps the people who feel this way should have no more rights than an animal. That is cold, that a person could say that. Human life is the most valuable to God or he wouldn't have given us the means to protect and preserve our rights.
Certain animals need more protection than others because they don’t particularly need to be on the list. Animals like the Bangle Tiger or the Siamang are the most threatened besides others because they are loved for their skins or they are wanted as pets. They go through the pet trade there whole life because they are so rare and beautiful. Just because the animals are a prize kill or to have doesn’t mean people should harm or endanger them.
A similar technique is also seen in Animal Farm with the “Seven Commandments.” At the start of the revolution, the pigs create a series of commandments or rules the animals should follow. After Snowball is banished and over time, the commandments are morphed into what the pigs think make better sense. The commandments get interpreted to fit the pigs’ desires. The novel gives a create example:
...ed by law because of murdering others, then it is wrong to kill animals as well.