Andrew Jackson's Abuse Of Power

882 Words2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States and was, arguably, the president that caused the most controversy. History shows Andrew Jackson overused his power yet, despite this, he was still well liked by the common men that elected him. Andrew Jackson used more veto power than all of his predecessors combined. He used his law making and veto power according to how he wanted the government to be perceived. At the time, Andrew Jackson was admired by many people. His laws represented the common man and were in line with what the citizens of America wanted, regardless of the actual effect on the economy and government. Despite the voter views, Andrew Jackson only acted according to his wants and how he thought government should …show more content…

For example, as previously stated, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled against the Cherokee Indians getting removed from their land and forced into present day Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson used his presidential power to overrule on this decision. He removed the Cherokee Indians and sent them on the devastating Trail of Tears, all the while claiming he was looking out for their best interest. Andrew Jackson abused his vetoing power, making use of it more than all the previous presidents combined. This showed his inability to listen to his advisors and to other prominent political figures, a trait very important in a president. In this way, President Jackson exploits his power and authority. Jackson was given the power designated to a president and he truly did use that power, albeit irresponsibly, to the fullest of his ability. By overusing his power, Jackson profoundly showed the characteristics of a democratic …show more content…

It was a true stroke of luck that they appreciated his views and choices during his presidency. Without them agreeing, he would have been seen as a bad president. In hindsight, many did see the damage he caused with his reckless indifference to the needs and opinions of others. No matter what the common folk believed or wanted, Jackson would have still acted upon his own beliefs and opinions. Although his actions were appreciated but his fellow Jacksonian Democrats, he was, in fact, a democratic tyrant through his choices, lack of regard for opposing viewpoints, and overuse of his presidential

Open Document