Ancient Christian Commentary On Scripture

969 Words2 Pages

The first commentary that I consulted is Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture, that was written by Thomas C. Oden. This commentary took a couple of the points I have made thus far and confirmed them. The first being that when the angels’ announcement of the resurrection of Jesus reminds the women of when Jesus predicted his death and resurrection which reveals the divine plan that was prophesied many time prior to this. It also confirmed my thoughts on why the men did not believe the women. Due to women’s word not being as trust worthy in the sight of men’s word. This idea leads back to the fall and how Eve listened to Satan. The men felt they were crazed for telling them that Jesus was raised and it probably seemed odd to them that the …show more content…

The first making connection between how sin came into the world first through a woman and the restoration of sin was revealed to the women first. I knew that there had to be some type of significance to the women being the first to find out, but I did not make that connection to the fall. The commentary also made an interesting point about the disciples had leading to the foundation of our faith today. I do not fully agree with this one. Oden, makes the point that because of the disciple’s disbelief, anxiety, and questioning, this set a foundation of faith and we do not have to doubt because of the support or proof that was found from seeing, hearing, and touching done by them. This makes since but does not fully help support this claim due to societies push for evidence that is not only supported by the Bible, but also by outside historical writings. I agree with the idea behind it but I think that due to our societal change and strong Atheistic and Agnostic views of the world and the Bible what once seemed like enough evidence is not anymore and more outside Christendom sources are needed and preferred to prove what is written in the Bible. My point is because of this change we doubt and want different evidence than that which was provided by the

Open Document