Analyzing Wendell Berry's 'The Pleasures Of Eating'

755 Words2 Pages

For Berry's "The Pleasures of Eating":

1. Wendell Berry's main point was, we, as a society, are becoming more and more disconnected from our food. He makes this point by stating that, being ignorant about our food means we don't know what harmful chemicals are being put into our bodies. I don't believe Berry used much evidence, but he extensively reasoned,

2. Berry defines an "industrial eater" as, "a degraded, poor, and paltry thing." He compares it to your house turning into a motel, and clearly conveys a serious disliking to "industrial eaters."

3. What Berry means is, if we do not eat responsibly, then we are letting someone else control our food and it's sources. If we are being controlled, then obviously we are not free. He insists we should control what our food has in it, and where it comes from. He also explains, ways to do that would be by producing it ourselves, or by knowing where our food is grown, and how it is processed. …show more content…

I agree, and disagree, with Berry's point of view. I agree that our food should not be controlled, and we should not be complacent with the way our food is handled and produced. He is right by forcing us to question what is actually in our food, but I disagree with his idea to grow and produce out own food. In a perfect world, we would all have gardens, and time to work in those gardens, and then time to make our own food. The reality is, a lot of us work full time and have other responsibilities. I believe that it is impractical to suggest that everyone could live this lifestyle in order to eat responsibly. Though I agree that food should be more than convenience, and more about nutrition and priority, I disagree that the only solution available is to grow, or buy locally grown food, and then make your own

Open Document