Analysis Of Upton Sinclair's House Of Earth And The Jungle

1588 Words4 Pages

“House of Earth,” by Woody Guthrie and “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair have a powerful view on the United States claim to freedom. Guthrie and Sinclair present different situations because of the time period in which each work was written but the similarities between the characters, conditions and consequences of living in the United States are significant. In these stories, the main characters experience different journeys, but they both endure hope and disappointment that leads them to recognize their dreams, shaped by the stereotype of the American dream, are unreachable because of the restrictions they have. Guthrie and Sinclair use their works to show us that the United States lacks the freedom it claims to have by presenting Tike and …show more content…

He describes to Ella May how his whole life he has wanted to own land and be a foreman and boss but that dream was taken away by Ella May’s family, “but I never was anything, nothing more than just the old hardworking son of, well, a family of folks that lost their land to your very father” (Guthrie, 62). His family had owned the land but it was taken out from under them by Ella May’s father and they were no more than hardworking renters. That was the lowest Tike had ever been but he had not reached the rock bottom of the farming industry, so the hope of owning land was still there. Therefore, when the idea of a house of earth was presented by a government brochure that was mailed out to the farming population expressing that they could live in a safe, sanitary, and inexpensive house, the dream of building this …show more content…

Jurgis, Ona, and their family moved to the United States to have a better life. They want to live freely and succeed giving their kids a better life than they had. They had so much faith for America, but not long after they got to Chicago things start to go wrong. Jurgis is blind to the reality of corruption in Packingtown. Sinclair said it very well stating, “from top to bottom the place was simply a seething cauldron of jealousies and hatreds; there was no loyalty or decency anywhere about it, there was no place in it where a man counted for anything against a dollar” (Sinclair, 50). All of the bosses in Packingtown were in a corrupt alliance to step on anyone and everyone to stay on top because all they cared about was the money. They could care less about their workers, forcing everyone who worked in Packingtown to be wage slaves. All of the workers were replaceable as well. Because the immigration rate was so high, both immigrants and native Chicagoans were having a hard time finding jobs that if someone lost their job someone new was there to take their place. “All year round they had

Open Document