Analysis Of The Four Noble Truths

738 Words2 Pages

The Four Noble Truths, the foundation of all Buddhist thought, describe the beginning and end of suffering, as well as the process to end it. Buddha’s Thesis of Emptiness (Sunyata) asserts that our world isn’t real. Our lives are a realistic dream; furthermore, we only assume our environment and experiences are real. Additionally, we cannot wake up from this dream until we realize that reality is a delusion. At this point, we can then “terminate our attachment, our discernment, our perception, our conception, and enter the realm of Emptiness (nirvana)” (Liu 210). Buddhist denial of our perceived world is based on a “dogmatic conviction that only the Enlightened ones (Buddhas) know the Truth, and that the Truth is simply not what we as sentient beings come to believe as true through our sense perception and our conviction” (Liu 211).
The Four Noble Truths are as follows: (1) The Truth of Suffering, (2) The Truth of the origin of suffering, (3) The Truth of the cessation of suffering, and (4) The Truth of the way leading to cessation of suffering. The Truth of Suffering teaches that life unavoidably involves suffering. “Birth is suffering, ageing is suffering, sickness is suffering, death is suffering, sorrow and lamentation is suffering; association with the disliked is suffering, dissociation from the loved is suffering, not to get what one wants is suffering—in short the five aggregates affected by clinging are suffering” (Dhammacakka-ppavattana-sutta). The Truth of the origin of suffering teaches that suffering is caused by craving and rooted in ignorance. “It is the craving that produces renewal of being accompanied by relish and lust, and relishing this and that; in other words, craving for sensual desires, craving for being...

... middle of paper ...

...ssibility. However, his third argument counters that teaching of Buddha. Chuang Tzu’s third argument states that “when we are awake, we could also be dreaming” (Liu 161). Furthermore, Chuang Tzu’s final teaching regarding dreams asserts that “we can never be sure of our judgment that we are awake” or dreaming (Liu 161).
If Chuang Tzu is indeed correct in his teachings, how then can Buddha be positive that our reality is a dream? Couldn’t it also be true that our reality is real? Couldn’t flying free as a butterfly or living in a state of nirvana be the dream? Buddha would contend that neither what I perceive as real nor the butterfly is real. My ignorant craving for a sense of self creates a delusional fantasy where I am real. Perhaps he is correct; however, if so, then I would need proof that I, Chris, am not real. If Chris is not real, then who wrote this paper?

Open Document